mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kdump: crash_kexec()-smp_send_stop() race in panic
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:55:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319468137.3615.16.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)

Hello Vivek,

In our tests we ran into the following scenario:

Two CPUs have called panic at the same time. The first CPU called
crash_kexec() and the second CPU called smp_send_stop() in panic()
before crash_kexec() finished on the first CPU. So the second CPU
stopped the first CPU and therefore kdump failed.

1st CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->mutex_trylock(&kexec_mutex)-> do kdump

2nd CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->kexec_mutex already held by 1st CPU
       ->smp_send_stop()-> stop CPU 1 (stop kdump)

How should we fix this problem? One possibility could be to do
smp_send_stop() before we call crash_kexec().

What do you think?

Michael



             reply	other threads:[~2011-10-24 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-24 14:55 Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-10-24 15:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-24 15:23   ` Américo Wang
2011-10-24 17:07     ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-24 17:33       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-24 22:24         ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-10-25  8:33           ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-25  8:44       ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-25 12:04         ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-25 14:54           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-25 14:58           ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-25 15:08             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-25 15:28               ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-25 15:28               ` Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1319468137.3615.16.camel@br98xy6r \
    --to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®