From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753225Ab1KAJqV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 05:46:21 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.176]:40688 "EHLO smtp-out1.tiscali.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752759Ab1KAJqU (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 05:46:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols From: Paul Bolle To: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Michal Marek , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mikael Starvik , "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" In-Reply-To: <20111101085930.GF26898@axis.com> References: <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20111031224248.GB25411@sepie.suse.cz> <1320101716.14409.97.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20111101085930.GF26898@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1320140764.14409.135.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper > > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct? > > The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no. But yesterday you wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: [...] > > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within > > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add > > them when it actually lands) > > Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add > them in the same tree. So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course, but now I'm unsure what you intend to do. Paul Bolle