From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754772Ab1KOKJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:09:52 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.177]:33889 "EHLO smtp-out2.tiscali.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753959Ab1KOKJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:09:51 -0500 Subject: ARCH_PXA_ADX From: Paul Bolle To: Thierry Reding , Richard Purdie , Russell King , Wim Van Sebroeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:09:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1321351777.20271.166.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 0) Since v2.6.32 the mainline tree supports the "Avionic Design Xanthos Backlight Driver" (BACKLIGHT_ADX) and the "Avionic Design Xanthos watchdog" driver (ADX_WATCHDOG). These were added in commit 3b96ea9ef8 ("[...] Add support for the Avionic Design Xanthos backlight device.") and 38461c5c08 ("[...] Add support for the Avionic Design Xanthos watchdog timer."). 1) Both drivers' Kconfig symbols depend on the Kconfig symbol ARCH_PXA_ADX. At that time this symbol didn't exist. It still doesn't. I haven't been able to find anything remotely related (ie, I even did things like "git grep -i PXA | grep -i ADX"). 2) So it seems these two drivers could never have been built from the mainline tree. (I'm starting to think that the config tools should somehow check stuff like this.) 3) Is the above correct? If it is, why shouldn't I submit the trivial patch to remove both these drivers? Paul Bolle