From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755800Ab1KUKgq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:36:46 -0500 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:45980 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755234Ab1KUKgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:36:45 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,546,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="9035893" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] xen/granttable: Introducing grant table V2 stucture From: Ian Campbell To: ANNIE LI CC: "jeremy@goop.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , "kurt.hackel@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Durrant Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:36:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4ECA1F0D.5070303@oracle.com> References: <4EC3B62F.6080702@oracle.com> <1321451304-13559-1-git-send-email-annie.li@oracle.com> <4EC62E77.7090007@oracle.com> <1321613689.3664.305.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4EC6818B.3010904@oracle.com> <1321632271.3664.367.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4ECA1F0D.5070303@oracle.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1321871797.3664.376.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 09:51 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote: > This patch changes two places from the last one, > * removing gnttab_v1_ops > * change update_grant_entry_v1 into gnttab_update_entry_v1 The attached patch didn't have those changes. Ian. > > Thanks > Annie > > On 2011-11-19 0:04, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>>> +static struct gnttab_ops gnttab_v1_ops = { > >>>> + .map_frames = gnttab_map_frames_v1, > >>>> + .unmap_frames = gnttab_unmap_frames_v1, > >>>> + .update_entry = update_grant_entry_v1, > >>>> > >>> Any reason this one is not gnttab_foo? > >>> > >> Actually no, just keep the original name of this function. I'd like to > >> change it, maybe gnttab_update_entry_v1 is better? > > I think so. Similarly for the v2 variant. > > > > Ian. > > > >