From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756291Ab1KVI1d (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:27:33 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:40156 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754349Ab1KVI1S (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1321950432.27077.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413 From: Eric Dumazet To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Christian Kujau , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Markus Trippelsdorf , "Alex,Shi" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:27:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1321948113.27077.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20111121131531.GA1679@x4.trippels.de> <1321884966.10470.2.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121153621.GA1678@x4.trippels.de> <1321890510.10470.11.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121161036.GA1679@x4.trippels.de> <1321894353.10470.19.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <1321895706.10470.21.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121173556.GA1673@x4.trippels.de> <1321900743.10470.31.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121185215.GA1673@x4.trippels.de> <20111121195113.GA1678@x4.trippels.de> <1321907275.13860.12.camel@pasglop> <1321948113.27077.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 à 08:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit : > For x86, I wonder if our !X86_FEATURE_CX16 support is correct on SMP > machines. > By the way, I wonder why we still emit this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu() code and calls when compiling a kernel for a cpu implementing cmpxchg16b (CONFIG_MCORE2=y)