mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
To: <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
	<suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>, <eranian@google.com>,
	<brgerst@gmail.com>, <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	<Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave support
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:41:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322570488-21798-3-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322570488-21798-1-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>

Removed the functions fpu_fxrstor_checking() and restore_fpu_checking()
because they weren't doing anything. Removed redundant xsave/xrstor
implementations. Since xsave/xrstor is not specific to the FPU, and also
for consistency, all xsave/xrstor functions now take a xsave_struct
argument.

Signed-off-by: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302018656-586370-2-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h  |   20 +++-------
 arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h |   81 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c      |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c      |    4 +-
 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
index c9e09ea..a1c0d38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -227,12 +227,14 @@ static inline void fpu_fxsave(struct fpu *fpu)
 static inline void fpu_save_init(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
 	if (use_xsave()) {
-		fpu_xsave(fpu);
+		struct xsave_struct *xstate = &fpu->state->xsave;
+
+		fpu_xsave(xstate);
 
 		/*
 		 * xsave header may indicate the init state of the FP.
 		 */
-		if (!(fpu->state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xstate_bv & XSTATE_FP))
+		if (!(xstate->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv & XSTATE_FP))
 			return;
 	} else if (use_fxsr()) {
 		fpu_fxsave(fpu);
@@ -262,22 +264,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 }
 
-static inline int fpu_fxrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
-{
-	return fxrstor_checking(&fpu->state->fxsave);
-}
-
 static inline int fpu_restore_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
 	if (use_xsave())
-		return fpu_xrstor_checking(fpu);
+		return xrstor_checking(&fpu->state->xsave, -1);
 	else
-		return fpu_fxrstor_checking(fpu);
-}
-
-static inline int restore_fpu_checking(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return fpu_restore_checking(&tsk->thread.fpu);
+		return fxrstor_checking(&fpu->state->fxsave);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
index c6ce245..8bcbbce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
@@ -42,10 +42,11 @@ extern int check_for_xstate(struct i387_fxsave_struct __user *buf,
 			    void __user *fpstate,
 			    struct _fpx_sw_bytes *sw);
 
-static inline int fpu_xrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
+static inline int xrstor_checking(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
 {
-	struct xsave_struct *fx = &fpu->state->xsave;
 	int err;
+	u32 lmask = mask;
+	u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
 
 	asm volatile("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
 		     "2:\n"
@@ -55,13 +56,23 @@ static inline int fpu_xrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
 		     ".previous\n"
 		     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)
 		     : [err] "=r" (err)
-		     : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
+		     : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "0" (0)
 		     : "memory");
 
 	return err;
 }
 
-static inline int xsave_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
+static inline void xrstor_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
+{
+	u32 lmask = mask;
+	u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
+
+	asm volatile(".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
+		     : : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask)
+		     :   "memory");
+}
+
+static inline int xsave_checking(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
 {
 	int err;
 
@@ -74,58 +85,24 @@ static inline int xsave_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
 	if (unlikely(err))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	__asm__ __volatile__("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n"
-			     "2:\n"
-			     ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
-			     "3:  movl $-1,%[err]\n"
-			     "    jmp  2b\n"
-			     ".previous\n"
-			     ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-			     _ASM_ALIGN "\n"
-			     _ASM_PTR "1b,3b\n"
-			     ".previous"
-			     : [err] "=r" (err)
-			     : "D" (buf), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
-			     : "memory");
+	asm volatile("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n"
+		     "2:\n"
+		     ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
+		     "3:  movl $-1,%[err]\n"
+		     "    jmp  2b\n"
+		     ".previous\n"
+		     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,3b)
+		     : [err] "=r" (err)
+		     : "D" (buf), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
+		     : "memory");
+
 	if (unlikely(err) && __clear_user(buf, xstate_size))
 		err = -EFAULT;
-	/* No need to clear here because the caller clears USED_MATH */
-	return err;
-}
-
-static inline int xrestore_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf, u64 mask)
-{
-	int err;
-	struct xsave_struct *xstate = ((__force struct xsave_struct *)buf);
-	u32 lmask = mask;
-	u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
 
-	__asm__ __volatile__("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n"
-			     "2:\n"
-			     ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
-			     "3:  movl $-1,%[err]\n"
-			     "    jmp  2b\n"
-			     ".previous\n"
-			     ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-			     _ASM_ALIGN "\n"
-			     _ASM_PTR "1b,3b\n"
-			     ".previous"
-			     : [err] "=r" (err)
-			     : "D" (xstate), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "0" (0)
-			     : "memory");	/* memory required? */
+	/* No need to clear here because the caller clears USED_MATH */
 	return err;
 }
 
-static inline void xrstor_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
-{
-	u32 lmask = mask;
-	u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
-
-	asm volatile(".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
-		     : : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask)
-		     :   "memory");
-}
-
 static inline void xsave_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
 {
 	u32 lmask = mask;
@@ -136,7 +113,7 @@ static inline void xsave_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
 		     :   "memory");
 }
 
-static inline void fpu_xsave(struct fpu *fpu)
+static inline void fpu_xsave(struct xsave_struct *fx)
 {
 	/* This, however, we can work around by forcing the compiler to select
 	   an addressing mode that doesn't require extended registers. */
@@ -144,7 +121,7 @@ static inline void fpu_xsave(struct fpu *fpu)
 		".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27",
 		".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x37",
 		X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT,
-		[fx] "D" (&fpu->state->xsave), "a" (-1), "d" (-1) :
+		[fx] "D" (fx), "a" (-1), "d" (-1) :
 		"memory");
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 953d5f6..8e924d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ void __math_state_restore(void)
 	/*
 	 * Paranoid restore. send a SIGSEGV if we fail to restore the state.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(restore_fpu_checking(tsk))) {
+	if (unlikely(fpu_restore_checking(&tsk->thread.fpu))) {
 		stts();
 		force_sig(SIGSEGV, tsk);
 		return;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
index a391134..6b063d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int save_i387_xstate(void __user *buf)
 
 	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
 		if (use_xsave())
-			err = xsave_user(buf);
+			err = xsave_checking(buf);
 		else
 			err = fxsave_user(buf);
 
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int restore_user_xstate(void __user *buf)
 	/*
 	 * restore the state passed by the user.
 	 */
-	err = xrestore_user(buf, mask);
+	err = xrstor_checking((__force struct xsave_struct *)buf, mask);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-- 
1.7.5.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 12:41 [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, xsave: warn on #NM exceptions caused by the kernel Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` Hans Rosenfeld [this message]
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave signal frame setup Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86, xsave: rework fpu/xsave support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, xsave: remove unused code Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, xsave: more cleanups Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 21:31 ` [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Andi Kleen
2011-11-30 17:37   ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-30 21:52     ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-01 20:36       ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-02  2:01         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-02 11:20           ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 19:57             ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 20:00               ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 20:00                 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16 16:07   ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12     ` [RFC 1/5] x86, perf: Implement software-activation of lwp Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12       ` [RFC 2/5] perf: adds prototype for a new perf-context-type Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12       ` [RFC 3/5] perf: adds a new pmu-initialization-call Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12       ` [RFC 4/5] x86, perf: implements lwp-perf-integration (rc1) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-18  8:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-18 15:22           ` Benjamin Block
2011-12-18 23:43             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19  9:09               ` Robert Richter
2011-12-19 10:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 11:12                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 11:40                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 11:58                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 18:13                         ` Benjamin
2011-12-20  8:56                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20  9:15                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20  9:47                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-20 10:09                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 15:27                               ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-20 18:40                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21  0:07                                   ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-21 12:34                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 12:44                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-21 13:22                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 22:49                                           ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-23 10:53                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 11:46                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-23 10:56                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 15:48                           ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-20 18:27                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 22:47                               ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 12:00                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 13:55                                   ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-16 16:12       ` [RFC 5/5] x86, perf: adds support for the LWP threshold-int Hans Rosenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322570488-21798-3-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --to=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®