From: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
To: <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
<suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>, <eranian@google.com>,
<brgerst@gmail.com>, <robert.richter@amd.com>,
<Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave support
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:41:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322570488-21798-3-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322570488-21798-1-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Removed the functions fpu_fxrstor_checking() and restore_fpu_checking()
because they weren't doing anything. Removed redundant xsave/xrstor
implementations. Since xsave/xrstor is not specific to the FPU, and also
for consistency, all xsave/xrstor functions now take a xsave_struct
argument.
Signed-off-by: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302018656-586370-2-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h | 20 +++-------
arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h | 81 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c | 4 +-
4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
index c9e09ea..a1c0d38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -227,12 +227,14 @@ static inline void fpu_fxsave(struct fpu *fpu)
static inline void fpu_save_init(struct fpu *fpu)
{
if (use_xsave()) {
- fpu_xsave(fpu);
+ struct xsave_struct *xstate = &fpu->state->xsave;
+
+ fpu_xsave(xstate);
/*
* xsave header may indicate the init state of the FP.
*/
- if (!(fpu->state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xstate_bv & XSTATE_FP))
+ if (!(xstate->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv & XSTATE_FP))
return;
} else if (use_fxsr()) {
fpu_fxsave(fpu);
@@ -262,22 +264,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
}
-static inline int fpu_fxrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
-{
- return fxrstor_checking(&fpu->state->fxsave);
-}
-
static inline int fpu_restore_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
{
if (use_xsave())
- return fpu_xrstor_checking(fpu);
+ return xrstor_checking(&fpu->state->xsave, -1);
else
- return fpu_fxrstor_checking(fpu);
-}
-
-static inline int restore_fpu_checking(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return fpu_restore_checking(&tsk->thread.fpu);
+ return fxrstor_checking(&fpu->state->fxsave);
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
index c6ce245..8bcbbce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
@@ -42,10 +42,11 @@ extern int check_for_xstate(struct i387_fxsave_struct __user *buf,
void __user *fpstate,
struct _fpx_sw_bytes *sw);
-static inline int fpu_xrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
+static inline int xrstor_checking(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
{
- struct xsave_struct *fx = &fpu->state->xsave;
int err;
+ u32 lmask = mask;
+ u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
asm volatile("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
"2:\n"
@@ -55,13 +56,23 @@ static inline int fpu_xrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
".previous\n"
_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)
: [err] "=r" (err)
- : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
+ : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "0" (0)
: "memory");
return err;
}
-static inline int xsave_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
+static inline void xrstor_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
+{
+ u32 lmask = mask;
+ u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
+
+ asm volatile(".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
+ : : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask)
+ : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline int xsave_checking(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
{
int err;
@@ -74,58 +85,24 @@ static inline int xsave_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf)
if (unlikely(err))
return -EFAULT;
- __asm__ __volatile__("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n"
- "2:\n"
- ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
- "3: movl $-1,%[err]\n"
- " jmp 2b\n"
- ".previous\n"
- ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
- _ASM_ALIGN "\n"
- _ASM_PTR "1b,3b\n"
- ".previous"
- : [err] "=r" (err)
- : "D" (buf), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
- : "memory");
+ asm volatile("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n"
+ "2:\n"
+ ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
+ "3: movl $-1,%[err]\n"
+ " jmp 2b\n"
+ ".previous\n"
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,3b)
+ : [err] "=r" (err)
+ : "D" (buf), "a" (-1), "d" (-1), "0" (0)
+ : "memory");
+
if (unlikely(err) && __clear_user(buf, xstate_size))
err = -EFAULT;
- /* No need to clear here because the caller clears USED_MATH */
- return err;
-}
-
-static inline int xrestore_user(struct xsave_struct __user *buf, u64 mask)
-{
- int err;
- struct xsave_struct *xstate = ((__force struct xsave_struct *)buf);
- u32 lmask = mask;
- u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
- __asm__ __volatile__("1: .byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n"
- "2:\n"
- ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
- "3: movl $-1,%[err]\n"
- " jmp 2b\n"
- ".previous\n"
- ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
- _ASM_ALIGN "\n"
- _ASM_PTR "1b,3b\n"
- ".previous"
- : [err] "=r" (err)
- : "D" (xstate), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "0" (0)
- : "memory"); /* memory required? */
+ /* No need to clear here because the caller clears USED_MATH */
return err;
}
-static inline void xrstor_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
-{
- u32 lmask = mask;
- u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
-
- asm volatile(".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x2f\n\t"
- : : "D" (fx), "m" (*fx), "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask)
- : "memory");
-}
-
static inline void xsave_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
{
u32 lmask = mask;
@@ -136,7 +113,7 @@ static inline void xsave_state(struct xsave_struct *fx, u64 mask)
: "memory");
}
-static inline void fpu_xsave(struct fpu *fpu)
+static inline void fpu_xsave(struct xsave_struct *fx)
{
/* This, however, we can work around by forcing the compiler to select
an addressing mode that doesn't require extended registers. */
@@ -144,7 +121,7 @@ static inline void fpu_xsave(struct fpu *fpu)
".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x27",
".byte " REX_PREFIX "0x0f,0xae,0x37",
X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT,
- [fx] "D" (&fpu->state->xsave), "a" (-1), "d" (-1) :
+ [fx] "D" (fx), "a" (-1), "d" (-1) :
"memory");
}
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 953d5f6..8e924d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ void __math_state_restore(void)
/*
* Paranoid restore. send a SIGSEGV if we fail to restore the state.
*/
- if (unlikely(restore_fpu_checking(tsk))) {
+ if (unlikely(fpu_restore_checking(&tsk->thread.fpu))) {
stts();
force_sig(SIGSEGV, tsk);
return;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
index a391134..6b063d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int save_i387_xstate(void __user *buf)
if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
if (use_xsave())
- err = xsave_user(buf);
+ err = xsave_checking(buf);
else
err = fxsave_user(buf);
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int restore_user_xstate(void __user *buf)
/*
* restore the state passed by the user.
*/
- err = xrestore_user(buf, mask);
+ err = xrstor_checking((__force struct xsave_struct *)buf, mask);
if (err)
return err;
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 12:41 [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, xsave: warn on #NM exceptions caused by the kernel Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` Hans Rosenfeld [this message]
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, xsave: cleanup fpu/xsave signal frame setup Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86, xsave: rework fpu/xsave support Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, xsave: remove unused code Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, xsave: more cleanups Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86, xsave: remove lazy allocation of xstate area Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-29 21:31 ` [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Andi Kleen
2011-11-30 17:37 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-11-30 21:52 ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-01 20:36 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-02 2:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-02 11:20 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 19:57 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 20:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, xsave: add support for non-lazy xstates Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-07 20:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, xsave: add kernel support for AMDs Lightweight Profiling (LWP) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16 16:07 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12 ` [RFC 1/5] x86, perf: Implement software-activation of lwp Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12 ` [RFC 2/5] perf: adds prototype for a new perf-context-type Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12 ` [RFC 3/5] perf: adds a new pmu-initialization-call Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-16 16:12 ` [RFC 4/5] x86, perf: implements lwp-perf-integration (rc1) Hans Rosenfeld
2011-12-18 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-18 15:22 ` Benjamin Block
2011-12-18 23:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 9:09 ` Robert Richter
2011-12-19 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 11:12 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 11:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 18:13 ` Benjamin
2011-12-20 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-20 10:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 15:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-20 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 0:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-21 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 12:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-21 13:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 22:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-12-23 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 11:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-23 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 15:48 ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-20 18:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 22:47 ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 12:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 13:55 ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-16 16:12 ` [RFC 5/5] x86, perf: adds support for the LWP threshold-int Hans Rosenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322570488-21798-3-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
--to=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
--cc=Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®