From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756796Ab1K3IeO (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:34:14 -0500 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:46554 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751774Ab1K3IeN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:34:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1322642051.2123.11.camel@Joe-Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/28] namespace: checkpatch wanking From: Joe Perches To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:34:11 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20111130065014.GU2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20111130022245.GS2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1322624351.17214.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20111130065014.GU2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 06:50 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > - if (!(page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL))) > + page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!page) > return -ENOMEM; > Not sure... In general I'd agree, but in this case... Shrug. I'm not sure there's much of a case other than line count for keeping this a one-liner. If you want these sorts of changes to be redone after vfsmount-guts gets promoted, let me know.