On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the sequence
> which did touch MTD.  Since that one is dependent on this patch,
> wondering how we wanted to handle them.

I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to
merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy