mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/7] rcu: Keep invoking callbacks if CPU otherwise idle
Date: Sat,  3 Dec 2011 10:34:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322937282-19846-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111203183417.GA18914@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>

The rcu_do_batch() function that invokes callbacks for TREE_RCU and
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU normally throttles callback invocation to avoid degrading
scheduling latency.  However, as long as the CPU would otherwise be idle,
there is no downside to continuing to invoke any callbacks that have passed
through their grace periods.  In fact, processing such callbacks in a
timely manner has the benefit of increasing the probability that the
CPU can enter the power-saving dyntick-idle mode.

Therefore, this commit allows callback invocation to continue beyond the
preset limit as long as the scheduler does not have some other task to
run and as long as context is that of the idle task or the relevant
RCU kthread.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c        |    5 ++++-
 kernel/rcutree.h        |    1 +
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index c0ed376..4ec4b14 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1403,7 +1403,10 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		debug_rcu_head_unqueue(list);
 		__rcu_reclaim(rsp->name, list);
 		list = next;
-		if (++count >= bl)
+		/* Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do. */
+		if (++count >= bl &&
+		    (need_resched() ||
+		     (!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
 			break;
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 9bcfbc9..fddff92 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void);
 static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags);
 static void rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 static void invoke_rcu_callbacks_kthread(void);
+static bool rcu_is_callbacks_kthread(void);
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
 static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void);
 static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index dbcea6b..adb6e66 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1337,6 +1337,15 @@ static void invoke_rcu_callbacks_kthread(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Is the current CPU running the RCU-callbacks kthread?
+ * Caller must have preemption disabled.
+ */
+static bool rcu_is_callbacks_kthread(void)
+{
+	return __get_cpu_var(rcu_cpu_kthread_task) == current;
+}
+
+/*
  * Set the affinity of the boost kthread.  The CPU-hotplug locks are
  * held, so no one should be messing with the existence of the boost
  * kthread.
@@ -1780,6 +1789,11 @@ static void invoke_rcu_callbacks_kthread(void)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 }
 
+static bool rcu_is_callbacks_kthread(void)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 }
-- 
1.7.3.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-03 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-03 18:34 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Preview of fourth set of RCU changes for 3.3 Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/7] rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/7] rcu: Irq nesting is always 0 on rcu_enter_idle_common Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/7] rcu: Adaptive dyntick-idle preparation Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/7] rcu: remove redundant rcu_cpu_stall_suppress declaration Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/7] driver-core/cpu: Add cpu_is_hotpluggable() for rcutorture error analysis Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 21:06   ` Josh Triplett
2011-12-03 23:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Quiet RCU-lockdep warnings involving interrupt disabling Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-05  9:19   ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-05 16:45     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06  1:26       ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-06  2:12         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06  3:27           ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel.h: sched: introduce might_sleep_disabled() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06  3:28           ` [PATCH 2/3] rtmutex: introduce rt_mutex_lock_irqdisabled() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06  3:29           ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: use rt_mutex_lock_irqdisabled() in rcu_boost() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06  9:52         ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Quiet RCU-lockdep warnings involving interrupt disabling Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 10:05           ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 10:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 12:26               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 16:04                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:33                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:56                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 17:16                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 10:27           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 16:11             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:14               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 16:01           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-05  9:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 10:03     ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-05 16:48       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322937282-19846-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®