From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753088Ab1LHJsv (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 04:48:51 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:22923 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752850Ab1LHJss (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 04:48:48 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="45160981" Subject: Re: [PATCH] video IPUv1 fixes for different display connections From: Vinod Koul To: Sascha Hauer Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , Alberto Panizzo , Valentin Longchamp , Daniel Mack , Eric Benard In-Reply-To: <20111208093927.GU27267@pengutronix.de> References: <1322747932-24943-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1323329606.1641.25.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20111208093927.GU27267@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:17:23 +0530 Message-ID: <1323337643.1641.31.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:39 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Yes, you are right. Adding defines for these really makes this better > readable. BTW did you queue both patches or only the first one? Both :) -- ~Vinod