From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757570Ab1LNQhW (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:37:22 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:59198 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757362Ab1LNQhT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:37:19 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=FIuZNpUs c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=mkvx9NrORpUA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=T5wkqXLSuSZ8ugCE_pUA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1323880637.23971.34.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace,x86: Add x86 irq vector entry/exit tracepoints From: Steven Rostedt To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Seiji Aguchi , Vaibhav Nagarnaik , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Rubin , David Sharp , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Satoru Moriya Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:37:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111214163407.GE10791@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1311983978-10350-1-git-send-email-vnagarnaik@google.com> <1311983978-10350-3-git-send-email-vnagarnaik@google.com> <5C4C569E8A4B9B42A84A977CF070A35B2C57EE47BC@USINDEVS01.corp.hds.com> <20111213192556.GD2421@somewhere.redhat.com> <5C4C569E8A4B9B42A84A977CF070A35B2C57F7A6D7@USINDEVS01.corp.hds.com> <20111214163407.GE10791@somewhere.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3-3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Well ftrace is a whole subsystem that includes the function tracer and also an interface > for tracepoints in debugfs. Confusing isn't it ;) > I was rather suggesting the latter one. This is a good > choice for background tracing. And it supports stacktraces. If those generate too much > overhead perhaps you can tune the number of entries in the stacktrace, I don't remember > if we can do that currently but this can be an interesting feature. That would probably be trivial to add, especially now that we allow pretty much a full stack trace anyway. -- Steve