From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758956Ab1LPMaq (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:30:46 -0500 Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:55225 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756594Ab1LPMai (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:30:38 -0500 Subject: Re: unexpected taint message From: Johannes Berg To: Arend van Spriel Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <4EEB0EFC.5000302@broadcom.com> (sfid-20111216_102800_182196_AFD2D6CF) References: <4EEB0EFC.5000302@broadcom.com> (sfid-20111216_102800_182196_AFD2D6CF) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1324038636.3429.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 10:27 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > To whoever may know, > > Upon loading our driver module I get the following message: > > kernel: [ 344.805106] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint > > What exactly are the criteria for tainting? Our driver locking strategy > is something we want to refactor and having lock debugging during that > transition may be a life safer. cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted johannes