From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
asit.k.mallick@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, tsc: fix SMI induced variation in quick_pit_calibrate()
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:41:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326760869.16150.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFys9zddHAoKURGAeu0QYD_MC11uEyOQGU_4Ybsf200NkQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think your patch is a total hack that just compares the two last
> TSC deltas, but it's actually close to the "correct' thing in that it
> does start taking the time to see the last of the previous MSB into
> account.
yeah, it was a hack but your alternative sounds good.
> Now the delta is twice as big as before (it covers four PIT accesses,
> roughly 4us), so the comments might have to be updated to match, but
> the rest of the code should "just work" (except it might loop a bit
> longer, and maybe it gives closer to 250 ppm precision).
>
> Does this fix it for you? I have NOT tested it in any way.
>
also may be we should change the correction
from: delta += (long)(d2 - d1)/2;
to: delta += (long)(d2 - d1)/4;
I will give this patch a try.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-17 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-16 20:15 Suresh Siddha
2012-01-17 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 0:41 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2012-01-17 0:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 4:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-17 5:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 23:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-18 0:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, tsc: Fix " tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 2:47 ` [patch] x86, tsc: fix " Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1326760869.16150.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®