mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	asit.k.mallick@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, tsc: fix SMI induced variation in quick_pit_calibrate()
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:41:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326760869.16150.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFys9zddHAoKURGAeu0QYD_MC11uEyOQGU_4Ybsf200NkQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think your patch is a total hack that just compares the two last
> TSC deltas, but it's actually close to the "correct' thing in that it
> does start taking the time to see the last of the previous MSB into
> account.

yeah, it was a hack but your alternative sounds good.

> Now the delta is twice as big as before (it covers four PIT accesses,
> roughly 4us), so the comments might have to be updated to match, but
> the rest of the code should "just work" (except it might loop a bit
> longer, and maybe it gives closer to 250 ppm precision).
> 
> Does this fix it for you? I have NOT tested it in any way.
> 

also may be we should change the correction 

from: delta += (long)(d2 - d1)/2;
to:   delta += (long)(d2 - d1)/4;

I will give this patch a try.

thanks,
suresh




  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-17  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-16 20:15 Suresh Siddha
2012-01-17  0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17  0:41   ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2012-01-17  0:52     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17  1:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17  4:06         ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-17  5:15           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17 23:35             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-18  0:25               ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, tsc: Fix " tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2012-01-17  2:47 ` [patch] x86, tsc: fix " Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1326760869.16150.16.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®