From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754098Ab2AaDta (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:49:30 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:34322 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752558Ab2AaDt2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:49:28 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18QMIEdKBMQQLOu7kep4PycjECFifBY+/JwI6MNd4 OyqUc6tcRG4cq6 Message-ID: <1327981751.11541.2.camel@marge.simson.net> Subject: Re: Fix bug: Scheduler's idle-load-balancer not running in first 5 mins after bootup From: Mike Galbraith To: Diwakar Tundlam Cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" , "'Peter Zijlstra'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , Peter De Schrijver , Antti Miettinen , Matthew Longnecker , Kevin Kranzusch Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:49:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE466523791832BD5@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> References: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE466523791832BD5@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:14 -0800, Diwakar Tundlam wrote: > We ran into this at Nvidia. QA filed a bug saying coremark_4pthreads scores lower (as if running on 3 cores) when run shortly after bootup. But later its score increases to expected values on 4 cores. > > This patch is relevant to linux-2.6.39 but I noticed this fix is not made in linux-3.0, 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3 also. > > Please see commit log for more details of the problem and fix. > > Thanks, > Diwakar. > Tegra Android Kernel SW Engg. > NVIDIA. > Santa Clara, CA > > commit d04d7ef0e3f8c70bd6cd5abb2abc0236aa8d1f7c > Author: Diwakar Tundlam > Date: Wed Jan 18 18:58:57 2012 -0800 > > scheduler: domain: init next_balance in nohz_idle_balancer with jiffies > > The next_balance parameter of nohz_idle_balancer should be initialized > to jiffies since jiffies itself is initialized to 300 seconds shy of > overflow. Otherwise, nohz_idle_balancer does not run for the first 5 > mins after bootup. > > Signed-off-by: Diwakar Tundlam > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Frid > Reviewed-by: Peter Boonstoppel > Reviewed-by: Satya Popuri > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index c5b09f7..506c5da 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -8288,6 +8288,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void) > atomic_set(&nohz.load_balancer, nr_cpu_ids); > atomic_set(&nohz.first_pick_cpu, nr_cpu_ids); > atomic_set(&nohz.second_pick_cpu, nr_cpu_ids); > + nohz.next_balance = jiffies; > #endif > /* May be allocated at isolcpus cmdline parse time */ > if (cpu_isolated_map == NULL) Shouldn't that really be INITIAL_JIFFIES + HZ? -Mike