From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756350Ab2BAN16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:27:58 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:64104 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754617Ab2BAN14 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:27:56 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNy7LOme c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=0LOP1KteNnsA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=f6_CTDm5gc9VdVHFTJoA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1328102874.5882.62.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h From: Steven Rostedt To: Rusty Russell Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Li Zefan Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:27:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y5snhwwd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1327545664.22710.78.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120126102836.GD3853@elte.hu> <1327585945.22710.87.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120126135504.GA13107@elte.hu> <1327586669.22710.89.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1327588606.22710.100.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120126183946.GA14709@elte.hu> <87ehuldf0m.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1327924333.22710.157.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <87sjiwjzew.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20120131122016.GF32010@elte.hu> <1328014230.5882.29.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <87y5snhwwd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 17:18 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Here's the results I get, using the Ubuntu 3.0.0 config (minus > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, and rest with Enter held down). > > Applied, > Rusty. > Thanks Rusty! I originally had this in my own local git queue ready to be pushed to Ingo after I get your Ack. But I think it is better if this change goes through you. I'll take this change out and rebase, as none of my other work depends on it. Thanks again! -- Steve