From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 39/41] rcu: Wait at least a jiffy before declaring a CPU to be offline
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:41:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328125319-5205-39-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328125319-5205-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
The force_quiescent_state() function uses a state machine to help
force grace periods to completion. One of its responsibilities is to
detect offline CPUs, and to report quiescent states on their behalf.
However, the CPU hotplug process is not atomic, in fact, there is
significant uncertainty as to exactly when a given CPU came online or
went offline. For example, once a CPU has marked itself offline and
executed the CPU_DYING notifiers, it continues executing, entering
the scheduler and perhaps also the idle loop.
In the old days, force_quiescent_state() was guaranteed to wait for
several jiffies before declaring a given CPU offline. This is no
longer the case, due to some of the more aggressive rcutorture tests
and the CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ idle-entry code. Therefore, this commit
makes force_quiescent_state() explicitly wait for at least a jiffy
before declaring a CPU to be offline.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
kernel/rcutree.c | 21 +++++++--------------
kernel/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index 49587ab..f6f15ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -33,23 +33,23 @@ rcu/rcuboost:
The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows:
rcu_sched:
- 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ri=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0
- 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ri=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0
- 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ri=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0
- 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pgp=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0
- 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ri=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0
- 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ri=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0
- 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ri=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0
- 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pgp=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0
+ 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0
+ 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0
+ 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0
+ 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pgp=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0
+ 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0
+ 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0
+ 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0
+ 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pgp=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0
rcu_bh:
- 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0
- 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pgp=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0
+ 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pgp=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second
for rcu_bh. Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an
@@ -119,10 +119,6 @@ o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a
CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal
error, so it makes sense to err conservatively.
-o "ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a
- reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a
- quiescent state.
-
o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on
this CPU. This is the total number of callbacks, regardless
of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ce39431..5f71cd1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -320,25 +320,18 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
/*
- * If the CPU is offline, it is in a quiescent state. We can
- * trust its state not to change because interrupts are disabled.
+ * If the CPU is offline for more than a jiffy, it is in a quiescent
+ * state. We can trust its state not to change because interrupts
+ * are disabled. The reason for the jiffy's worth of slack is to
+ * handle CPUs initializing on the way up and finding their way
+ * to the idle loop on the way down.
*/
- if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) {
+ if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) &&
+ ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rsp->gp_start + 2, jiffies)) {
trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, "ofl");
rdp->offline_fqs++;
return 1;
}
-
- /*
- * The CPU is online, so send it a reschedule IPI. This forces
- * it through the scheduler, and (inefficiently) also handles cases
- * where idle loops fail to inform RCU about the CPU being idle.
- */
- if (rdp->cpu != smp_processor_id())
- smp_send_reschedule(rdp->cpu);
- else
- set_need_resched();
- rdp->resched_ipi++;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index e2ac8ee..cdd1be0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ struct rcu_data {
/* 4) reasons this CPU needed to be kicked by force_quiescent_state */
unsigned long dynticks_fqs; /* Kicked due to dynticks idle. */
unsigned long offline_fqs; /* Kicked due to being offline. */
- unsigned long resched_ipi; /* Sent a resched IPI. */
/* 5) __rcu_pending() statistics. */
unsigned long n_rcu_pending; /* rcu_pending() calls since boot. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index db0987c..ed459ed 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting,
rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi_nesting,
rdp->dynticks_fqs);
- seq_printf(m, " of=%lu ri=%lu", rdp->offline_fqs, rdp->resched_ipi);
+ seq_printf(m, " of=%lu", rdp->offline_fqs);
seq_printf(m, " ql=%ld/%ld qs=%c%c%c%c",
rdp->qlen_lazy, rdp->qlen,
".N"[rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] !=
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting,
rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi_nesting,
rdp->dynticks_fqs);
- seq_printf(m, ",%lu,%lu", rdp->offline_fqs, rdp->resched_ipi);
+ seq_printf(m, ",%lu", rdp->offline_fqs);
seq_printf(m, ",%ld,%ld,\"%c%c%c%c\"", rdp->qlen_lazy, rdp->qlen,
".N"[rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] !=
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]],
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
{
seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
- seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"ri\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
+ seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
--
1.7.8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 19:41 [PATCH RFC 0/41] RCU commits for 3.4 Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/41] rcu: Bring RTFP.txt up to date Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/41] rcu: Improve synchronize_rcu() diagnostics Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/41] rcu: Add lockdep-RCU checks for simple self-deadlock Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 0:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 19:56 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 9:04 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 18:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/41] rcu: Add diagnostic for misaligned rcu_head structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 1:00 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 20:11 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 1:01 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/41] rcu: Avoid waking up CPUs having only kfree_rcu() callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 1:15 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/41] rcu: Move RCU_TRACE to lib/Kconfig.debug Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 1:39 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/41] s390: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/41] tcm_fc: " Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/41] ipv4: " Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:49 ` David Miller
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/41] " Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:50 ` David Miller
2012-02-02 0:24 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/41] mac80211: " Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/41] rcu: Simplify offline processing Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/41] rcu: Make rcutorture flag online/offline failures Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 1:46 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/41] rcu: Limit lazy-callback duration Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 2:03 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 4:07 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 5:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/41] rcu: Check for callback invocation from offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/41] rcu: Don't make callbacks go through second full grace period Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/41] rcu: Remove single-rcu_node optimization in rcu_start_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 2:13 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/41] rcu: Protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 19/41] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 20/41] rcu: Prevent RCU callbacks from executing before scheduler initialized Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 21/41] rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 2:30 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 22/41] rcu: Simplify unboosting checks Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 2:38 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 4:23 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 23/41] rcu: Clean up straggling rcu_preempt_needs_cpu() name Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 24/41] rcu: Check for idle-loop entry while in RCU read-side critical section Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 5:13 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 25/41] rcu: Make rcu_sleep_check() also check rcu_lock_map Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 26/41] rcu: Note that rcu_access_pointer() can be used for teardown Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 27/41] rcu: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP from TREE_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 28/41] rcu: Set RCU CPU stall times via sysfs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 29/41] rcu: Print scheduling-clock information on RCU CPU stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 30/41] rcutorture: Permit holding off CPU-hotplug operations during boot Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 5:43 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 31/41] rcu: Add CPU-stall capability to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 5:53 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 9:15 ` Julia Lawall
2012-02-02 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 32/41] rcu: Update stall-warning documentation Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 5:56 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 5:42 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 5:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 33/41] rcu: Make boolean rcutorture parameters be of type "bool" Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 34/41] rcu: Check for illegal use of RCU from offlined CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 35/41] rcu: Move synchronize_sched_expedited() to rcutree.c Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 36/41] rcu: No interrupt disabling for rcu_prepare_for_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 37/41] lockdep: Add CPU-idle/offline warning to lockdep-RCU splat Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 6:07 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 6:12 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 38/41] rcu: Rework detection of use of RCU by offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 6:11 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 9:17 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-01 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-02-02 6:12 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 39/41] rcu: Wait at least a jiffy before declaring a CPU to be offline Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 18:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 40/41] rcu: Call out dangers of expedited RCU primitives Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 41/41] rcu: Trace only after NULL-pointer check Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 0:18 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/41] rcu: Bring RTFP.txt up to date Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 1:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 2:01 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 22:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 22:47 ` [PATCH RFC 0/41] RCU commits for 3.4 Kevin Hilman
2012-02-02 23:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-06 7:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328125319-5205-39-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®