mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com,
	robert.richter@amd.com, ming.m.lin@intel.com,
	andi@firstfloor.org, asharma@fb.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov,
	vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dsahern@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/18] perf: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2012 13:54:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328187288-24395-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328187288-24395-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

If precise sampling is enabled on Intel X86, then perf_event uses PEBS.
To correct for the off-by-one error of PEBS, perf_event uses LBR when
precise_sample > 1.

On Intel X86, PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK is implemented using LBR,
therefore both features must be coordinated as they may not
configure LBR the same way.

For PEBS, LBR needs to capture all branches at the priv level of
the associated event.

This patch checks that the branch type and priv level of BRANCH_STACK
is compatible with that of the PEBS LBR requirement, thereby allowing:

   $ perf record -b any,u -e instructions:upp ....

But
   $ perf record -b any_call,u -e instructions:upp

Is not possible.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 3779313..71e0264 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -353,6 +353,36 @@ int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * check that branch_sample_type is compatible with
+ * settings needed for precise_ip > 1 which implies
+ * using the LBR to capture ALL taken branches at the
+ * priv levels of the measurement
+ */
+static inline int precise_br_compat(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	u64 m = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+	u64 b = 0;
+
+	/* must capture all branches */
+	if (!(m & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY))
+		return 0;
+
+	m &= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL | PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+	if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
+		b |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+	if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
+		b |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
+
+	/*
+	 * ignore PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV, not supported on X86
+	 */
+
+	return m == b;
+}
+
 int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	if (event->attr.precise_ip) {
@@ -369,6 +399,36 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 
 		if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		/*
+		 * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
+		 * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
+		 */
+		if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1) {
+			u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+			if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+				if (!precise_br_compat(event))
+					return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+				/* branch_sample_type is compatible */
+
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * user did not specify  branch_sample_type
+				 *
+				 * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
+				 * the branches at the priv level of the
+				 * event.
+				 */
+				*br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
+
+				if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
+					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+				if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
+					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
1.7.4.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-02 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-02 12:54 [PATCH v5 00/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branches Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] perf: add generic taken branch sampling support Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] perf: add Intel LBR MSR definitions Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] perf: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] perf: add Intel X86 LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] perf: disable LBR support for older Intel Atom processors Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] perf: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] perf: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] perf: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 19:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 19:59     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] perf: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 18:06   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-07 14:11     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-07 15:21       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 18:08   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 18:14   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] perf: fix endianness detection in perf.data Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 18:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 18:18     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 21:47     ` David Ahern
2012-02-06 22:06       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 22:29         ` David Ahern
2012-02-07 14:13           ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-07 14:38             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-17  9:42   ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: " tip-bot for Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] perf: add ABI reference sizes Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] perf: enable reading of perf.data files from different ABI rev Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 18:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 18:22   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-07  7:03     ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-02-07 14:52       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 22:19   ` David Ahern
2012-02-07 15:50     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-07 16:41       ` David Ahern
2012-02-07 17:42         ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-07 17:57           ` David Ahern
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] perf: fix bug print_event_desc() Stephane Eranian
2012-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] perf: make perf able to read file from older ABIs Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1328187288-24395-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=asharma@fb.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®