mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 35/47] rcu: Check for illegal use of RCU from offlined CPUs
Date: Fri,  3 Feb 2012 17:45:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328319922-30828-35-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328319922-30828-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>

Although it is legal to use RCU during early boot, it is anything
but legal to use RCU at runtime from an offlined CPU.  After all, RCU
explicitly ignores offlined CPUs.  This commit therefore adds checks
for runtime use of RCU from offlined CPUs.

These checks are not perfect, in particular, they can be subverted
through use of things like rcu_dereference_raw().  Note that it is not
possible to put checks in rcu_read_lock() and friends due to the fact
that these primitives are used in code that might be used under either
RCU or lock-based protection, which means that checking rcu_read_lock()
gets you fat piles of false positives.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/srcu.h     |   11 +++++++----
 kernel/rcupdate.c        |    5 +++++
 kernel/rcutree.c         |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h  |    1 +
 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index f409529..146d37d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -226,6 +226,15 @@ static inline void destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(struct rcu_head *head)
 }
 #endif	/* #else !CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD */
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)
+bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void);
+#else /* #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) */
+static inline bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+#endif /* #else #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
@@ -270,6 +279,9 @@ extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
  * occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
  * rcu_read_unlock() in process context if the matching rcu_read_lock()
  * was invoked from within an irq handler.
+ *
+ * Note that rcu_read_lock() is disallowed if the CPU is either idle or
+ * offline from an RCU perspective, so check for those as well.
  */
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
 {
@@ -277,6 +289,8 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
 		return 1;
 	if (rcu_is_cpu_idle())
 		return 0;
+	if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
+		return 0;
 	return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
 }
 
@@ -313,6 +327,9 @@ extern int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void);
  * notice an extended quiescent state to other CPUs that started a grace
  * period. Otherwise we would delay any grace period as long as we run in
  * the idle task.
+ *
+ * Similarly, we avoid claiming an SRCU read lock held if the current
+ * CPU is offline.
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
@@ -323,6 +340,8 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 		return 1;
 	if (rcu_is_cpu_idle())
 		return 0;
+	if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
+		return 0;
 	if (debug_locks)
 		lockdep_opinion = lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
 	return lockdep_opinion || preempt_count() != 0 || irqs_disabled();
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index e1b0059..9a32372 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -99,15 +99,18 @@ long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *sp);
  * power mode. This way we can notice an extended quiescent state to
  * other CPUs that started a grace period. Otherwise we would delay any
  * grace period as long as we run in the idle task.
+ *
+ * Similarly, we avoid claiming an SRCU read lock held if the current
+ * CPU is offline.
  */
 static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(struct srcu_struct *sp)
 {
-	if (rcu_is_cpu_idle())
-		return 0;
-
 	if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
 		return 1;
-
+	if (rcu_is_cpu_idle())
+		return 0;
+	if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
+		return 0;
 	return lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 2bc4e13..a86f174 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled);
  * section.
  *
  * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot.
+ *
+ * Note that rcu_read_lock() is disallowed if the CPU is either idle or
+ * offline from an RCU perspective, so check for those as well.
  */
 int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
 {
@@ -95,6 +98,8 @@ int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
 		return 1;
 	if (rcu_is_cpu_idle())
 		return 0;
+	if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
+		return 0;
 	return in_softirq() || irqs_disabled();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_bh_held);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index dccd2f7..bcf7db2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -591,6 +591,35 @@ int rcu_is_cpu_idle(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_is_cpu_idle);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+
+/*
+ * Is the current CPU online?  Disable preemption to avoid false positives
+ * that could otherwise happen due to the current CPU number being sampled,
+ * this task being preempted, its old CPU being taken offline, resuming
+ * on some other CPU, then determining that its old CPU is now offline.
+ * It is OK to use RCU on an offline processor during initial boot, hence
+ * the check for rcu_scheduler_fully_active.
+ *
+ * Disable checking if in an NMI handler because we cannot safely report
+ * errors from NMI handlers anyway.
+ */
+bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void)
+{
+	bool ret;
+
+	if (in_nmi())
+		return 1;
+	preempt_disable();
+	ret = cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) ||
+	      !rcu_scheduler_fully_active;
+	preempt_enable();
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online);
+
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
+
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
 
 /**
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 7044750..7addcdf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1946,6 +1946,7 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
 	/* Note that atomic_inc_return() implies full memory barrier. */
 	firstsnap = snap = atomic_inc_return(&sync_sched_expedited_started);
 	get_online_cpus();
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()));
 
 	/*
 	 * Each pass through the following loop attempts to force a
-- 
1.7.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-04  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-04  1:44 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/N] v2 RCU commits for 3.4 Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/47] rcu: Bring RTFP.txt up to date Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/47] rcu: Improve synchronize_rcu() diagnostics Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/47] rcu: Add lockdep-RCU checks for simple self-deadlock Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/47] rcu: Add diagnostic for misaligned rcu_head structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/47] rcu: Avoid waking up CPUs having only kfree_rcu() callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/47] rcu: Move RCU_TRACE to lib/Kconfig.debug Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/47] s390: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu(), drop ext_int_hash_update() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/47] tcm_fc: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu(), drop ft_tport_rcu_free() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/47] ipv4: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu(), drop opt_kfree_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/47] ipv4: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu(), drop opt_kfree_rcu Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/47] mac80211: Convert call_rcu() to kfree_rcu(), drop mesh_gate_node_reclaim() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/47] rcu: Simplify offline processing Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/47] rcu: Make rcutorture flag online/offline failures Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/47] rcu: Limit lazy-callback duration Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04 13:54     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-04 14:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04 14:32         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/47] rcu: Check for callback invocation from offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/47] rcu: Don't make callbacks go through second full grace period Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/47] rcu: Remove single-rcu_node optimization in rcu_start_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/47] rcu: Protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/47] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/47] rcu: Prevent RCU callbacks from executing before scheduler initialized Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/47] rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/47] rcu: Simplify unboosting checks Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/47] rcu: Clean up straggling rcu_preempt_needs_cpu() name Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:44   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/47] rcu: Check for idle-loop entry while in RCU read-side critical section Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/47] rcu: Make rcu_sleep_check() also check rcu_lock_map Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/47] rcu: Note that rcu_access_pointer() can be used for teardown Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/47] rcu: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP from TREE_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 28/47] rcu: Set RCU CPU stall times via sysfs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 29/47] rcu: Print scheduling-clock information on RCU CPU stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/47] rcutorture: Permit holding off CPU-hotplug operations during boot Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 31/47] rcu: Make documentation give more realistic rcutorture duration Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 32/47] rcu: Add CPU-stall capability to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 33/47] rcu: Update stall-warning documentation Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 34/47] rcu: Make boolean rcutorture parameters be of type "bool" Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/47] rcu: Move synchronize_sched_expedited() to rcutree.c Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 37/47] rcu: No interrupt disabling for rcu_prepare_for_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 38/47] lockdep: Add CPU-idle/offline warning to lockdep-RCU splat Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 39/47] rcu: Rework detection of use of RCU by offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/47] rcu: Call out dangers of expedited RCU primitives Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 41/47] rcu: Trace only after NULL-pointer check Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/47] rcu: Convert WARN_ON_ONCE() in rcu_lock_acquire() to lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 43/47] PTR_ERR should be called before its argument is cleared Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 44/47] rcu: Remove redundant check for rcu_head misalignment Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 45/47] rcu: Allow nesting of rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-09  4:07     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-09 15:26       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-09 15:33         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 46/47] rcu: Add RCU_NONIDLE() for idle-loop RCU read-side critical sections Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-04  1:45   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 47/47] cpuidle: Inform RCU of " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1328319922-30828-35-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®