From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/rcu: Add _rcuidle() tracepoint to handle rcu_idle_exit() tracepoints
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:16:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329333379.10311.3.camel@acer.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120214180947.GA30057@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:09 +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some problem with cpuidle tracing:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42742
>
> so I applied 3 patches from https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2012/2/7/231
>
> > Steven Rostedt (3):
> > tracing/rcu: Add trace_##name##__rcuidle() static tracepoint for inside rcu_idle_exit() sections
> > x86/tracing: Denote the power and cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
> > cpuidle/tracing: Denote the tracepoints as being in rcu_idle_exit() section
>
> All 3 patches applied cleanly but for unknown reasons to me compilation fails:
Yeah, my testing hit this issue and I fixed it up. I pushed out my
patches to Ingo that have passed all my tests. You can get them here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/13/528
You only need to apply patches 3,4 and 5.
-- Steve
>
> CC arch/x86/kernel/process.o
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c: In function ‘default_idle’:
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:380:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_start_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:394:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_power_end_rcuidle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 18:09 Witold Baryluk
2012-02-15 19:16 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-07 14:56 Steven Rostedt
2012-02-07 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-07 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-07 20:17 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329333379.10311.3.camel@acer.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®