From: santosh nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
To: jack_wang@usish.com
Cc: lindar_liu@usish.com, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [SCSI] pm8001: Fix possible racing codition.
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:05:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330263303-25177-1-git-send-email-santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
There is a possble racing scenario.
'process_oq' is called by two routines, as shown below.
pm8001_8001_dispatch = {
.......
.isr = pm8001_chip_isr --> process_oq,// A
.isr_process_oq = process_oq, // B
.....
}
process_oq() --> process_one_iomb() --> mpi_sata_completion()
In 'mpi_sata_completion', "pm8001_ha->lock" is first released.
It means lock is taken before, which is true for
the context A, as 'pm8001_ha->lock' is taken in 'pm8001_chip_isr()'
But for context B there is no lock taken before and pm8001_ha->lock
is unlocked in 'mpi_sata_completion()'. This may unlock the lock
taken in context A. Possible racing ??
If 'pm8001_ha->lock' is taken in 'process_oq()' instead of
'pm8001_chip_isr' then the above issue can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
index 838e3e2..6d9973b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
@@ -3663,7 +3663,9 @@ static int process_oq(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
void *pMsg1 = NULL;
u8 uninitialized_var(bc);
u32 ret = MPI_IO_STATUS_FAIL;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
circularQ = &pm8001_ha->outbnd_q_tbl[0];
do {
ret = mpi_msg_consume(pm8001_ha, circularQ, &pMsg1, &bc);
@@ -3682,6 +3684,7 @@ static int process_oq(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
break;
}
} while (1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -4087,12 +4090,9 @@ static u32 pm8001_chip_is_our_interupt(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
static irqreturn_t
pm8001_chip_isr(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
pm8001_chip_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha);
process_oq(pm8001_ha);
pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
1.7.4.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-26 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-26 13:35 santosh nayak [this message]
2012-02-27 4:48 ` Jack Wang
2012-02-27 5:02 ` santosh prasad nayak
2012-02-27 5:06 ` Jack Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330263303-25177-1-git-send-email-santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com \
--to=santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=jack_wang@usish.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lindar_liu@usish.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®