From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754339Ab2CJNyl (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:54:41 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:12196 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753783Ab2CJNyk (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:54:40 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Wf+OmjdX c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=LV9YWpXf9bAA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=hs_wspsX514VuIXZtfwA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1331387676.25686.617.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use enum instead of literals for trap values From: Steven Rostedt To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Hidetoshi Seto , Andrew Morton , Mike Frysinger , Peter Zijlstra Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:54:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120310101521.GA18106@liondog.tnic> References: <20120309074202.GA28609@www.outflux.net> <20120309092845.GA10281@elte.hu> <4F5A448D.70605@zytor.com> <20120309182829.GA13745@aftab> <20120309190842.GC13745@aftab> <4F5A644C.3080306@zytor.com> <1331324518.25686.606.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120310101521.GA18106@liondog.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:15 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:21:58PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > For the Linux made up ones, a more descriptive name is better. Then > > there wont be confusion when people look at "IR" and can't find it > > online or in the document, and scratch their head thinking they are not > > smart enough to do kernel development and we lose another kernel > > developer ;-) > > Like that ever happens... Kernel developers have thick heads, in most > cases thicker than processor manuals. I'm talking about new kernel developers, not the current ones ;-) -- Steve