From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:27:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331882861.11010.13.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120315175933.GB8705@sgi.com>
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:59 -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:07:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 03:42 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does the following work better? It does pass my fake-big-system tests
> > > > (more testing in the works).
> > >
> > > Yup, tip booted fine. Thanks! I'll test, see if it gets upset.
> >
> > Wedged into 3.0 enterprise booted fine too, is now running rcutorture.
> > I'll add hotplug after it runs explosion free for a while. Any
> > suggestions for giving both virgin and 3.0 a thorough trouncing?
>
> Mike,
>
> Could I try your 3.0 enterprise patch?
Sure, v3 below. Boots on my little boxen.
caveat: looks to me like it should be equivalent, but what I know about
RCUs gizzard will cover the bottom of a thimble.. maybe.
rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online
The current grace-period initialization initializes all leaf rcu_node
structures, even those corresponding to CPUs that have never been online.
This is harmless in many configurations, but results in 200-microsecond
latency spikes for kernels built with NR_CPUS=4096.
This commit therefore keeps track of the largest-numbered CPU that has
ever been online, and limits grace-period initialization to rcu_node
structures corresponding to that CPU and to smaller-numbered CPUs.
Reported-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/rcutree.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_d
static struct rcu_state *rcu_state;
+int rcu_max_cpu __read_mostly; /* Largest # CPU that has ever been online. */
+
/*
* The rcu_scheduler_active variable transitions from zero to one just
* before the first task is spawned. So when this variable is zero, RCU
@@ -935,7 +937,7 @@ static void rcu_report_qs_rsp(struct rcu
rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
rsp->signaled = RCU_GP_IDLE;
- rcu_start_gp(rsp, flags); /* releases root node's rnp->lock. */
+ rcu_start_gp(rsp, flags); /* releases root node's ->lock. */
}
/*
@@ -1862,6 +1864,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_init;
/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
@@ -1882,6 +1885,20 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu
/* Exclude any attempts to start a new GP on large systems. */
raw_spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ /*
+ * Initialize any rcu_node structures that will see their first use.
+ * Note that rcu_max_cpu cannot change out from under us because the
+ * hotplug locks are held.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ for (rnp_init = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, rcu_max_cpu)->mynode + 1;
+ rnp_init <= rdp->mynode;
+ rnp_init++) {
+ rnp_init->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
+ rnp_init->completed = rsp->completed;
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+
/* Add CPU to rcu_node bitmasks. */
rnp = rdp->mynode;
mask = rdp->grpmask;
@@ -1907,6 +1924,11 @@ static void __cpuinit rcu_prepare_cpu(in
rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_sched_state, 0);
rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_state, 0);
rcu_preempt_init_percpu_data(cpu);
+ if (cpu > rcu_max_cpu) {
+ smp_mb(); /* Initialization before rcu_max_cpu assignment. */
+ rcu_max_cpu = cpu;
+ smp_mb(); /* rcu_max_cpu assignment before later uses. */
+ }
}
/*
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -191,11 +191,23 @@ struct rcu_node {
/*
* Do a full breadth-first scan of the rcu_node structures for the
- * specified rcu_state structure.
+ * specified rcu_state structure. The caller must hold either the
+ * ->onofflock or the root rcu_node structure's ->lock.
*/
+extern int rcu_max_cpu;
+static inline int rcu_get_max_cpu(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ smp_mb(); /* Pairs with barriers in rcu_prepare_cpu(). */
+ ret = rcu_max_cpu;
+ smp_mb(); /* Pairs with barriers in rcu_prepare_cpu(). */
+ return ret;
+}
#define rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) \
for ((rnp) = &(rsp)->node[0]; \
- (rnp) < &(rsp)->node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; (rnp)++)
+ (rnp) <= per_cpu_ptr((rsp)->rda, rcu_get_max_cpu())->mynode; \
+ (rnp)++)
/*
* Do a breadth-first scan of the non-leaf rcu_node structures for the
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 0:24 Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 9:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 12:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 13:08 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-14 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 2:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 3:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 17:21 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 4:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:59 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 7:27 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2012-03-16 8:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 8:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 17:28 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 17:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 15:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 20:24 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-23 4:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-23 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11 11:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-13 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 5:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:58 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-15 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 15:46 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 17:07 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331882861.11010.13.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome