From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754386Ab2C0QYg (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:24:36 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:19091 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753040Ab2C0QYd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:24:33 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NYRkJh/4 c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=3MQ0ZmHyo4IA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=dOFtwhc8ZEl-KJzZ4hMA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1332865469.23924.129.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/32] nohz/cpuset: Don't turn off the tick if rcu needs it From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , linaro-sched-sig@lists.linaro.org, Alessio Igor Bogani , Andrew Morton , Avi Kivity , Chris Metcalf , Daniel Lezcano , Geoff Levand , Gilad Ben Yossef , Ingo Molnar , Max Krasnyansky , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Stephen Hemminger , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Thomas Gleixner , Zen Lin Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:24:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <1332338318-5958-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1332338318-5958-13-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120327121341.GE13196@somewhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 11:13 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Please do not use "realtime" since I am not sure what you mean by that. > Its for a low latency applications that cannot use "realtime" because that > implies high latencies. This statement totally confuses me, as the whole point of the -rt (realtime) patch, is for lower latencies. Where do you get "realtime" implies high latencies from? -- Steve