From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754112Ab2DLEfr (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:35:47 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:46112 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137Ab2DLEfq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:35:46 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="129923751" Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] clockevents: tTack broadcast device mode change in tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot() From: Suresh Siddha Reply-To: Suresh Siddha To: Alex Shi Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Alex Shi , "Chen, Tim C" In-Reply-To: References: <1334011304.12400.81.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Intel Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:35:54 -0700 Message-ID: <1334205354.2583.1.camel@sbsiddha-mobl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:27 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > This patch recovered the loopback netperf testing on NHM machine, but > on SNB machine, It isn't need a broadcost timer at all. > > Do you think it is better to remove oneshot broadcast on WSM/SNB machine? on WSM/SNB, we already don't use broadcast timer and always use apictimer instead. thanks, suresh