mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334347895-6268-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

There's no reason to keep blkgs around if no policy is activated for
the queue.  This patch moves queue locking out of blkg_destroy_all()
and call it from blkg_deactivate_policy() on deactivation of the last
policy on the queue.

This change was suggested by Vivek.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-cgroup.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 10f0d2f..b1807d4 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void blkg_destroy_all(struct request_queue *q)
 {
 	struct blkio_group *blkg, *n;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(blkg, n, &q->blkg_list, q_node) {
 		struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
@@ -267,8 +267,6 @@ static void blkg_destroy_all(struct request_queue *q)
 		blkg_destroy(blkg);
 		spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
 	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 }
 
 static void blkg_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
@@ -646,7 +644,10 @@ void blkcg_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q)
  */
 void blkcg_exit_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 {
+	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 	blkg_destroy_all(q);
+	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
 	blk_throtl_exit(q);
 }
 
@@ -802,6 +803,10 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
 
 	__clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols);
 
+	/* if no policy is left, no need for blkgs - shoot them down */
+	if (bitmap_empty(q->blkcg_pols, BLKCG_MAX_POLS))
+		blkg_destroy_all(q);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) {
 		/* grab blkcg lock too while removing @pd from @blkg */
 		spin_lock(&blkg->blkcg->lock);
-- 
1.7.7.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 20:11 [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] cfq: fix build breakage & warnings Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] blkcg: kill blkio_list and replace blkio_list_lock with a mutex Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] blkcg: use @pol instead of @plid in update_root_blkg_pd() and blkcg_print_blkgs() Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] blkcg: remove static policy ID enums Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:50   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:32   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:44       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:47         ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:55           ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:05             ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:16               ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:31                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 12:04                 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-18 21:42                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 12:39                   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] blkcg: implement per-queue policy activation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-04-20  8:09 ` [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 12:02   ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 17:17     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 19:08       ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-25 18:19         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1334347895-6268-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rni@google.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome