From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
patches@linaro.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/7] rcu: Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:20:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334420437-19264-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120414161953.GA18140@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Currently, PREEMPT_RCU readers are enqueued upon entry to the scheduler.
This is inefficient because enqueuing is required only if there is a
context switch, and entry to the scheduler does not guarantee a context
switch.
The commit therefore moves the enqueuing to immediately precede the
call to switch_to() from the scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 1 +
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 +
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 6 ------
include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/rcutree.c | 1 -
kernel/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 14 +++-----------
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
8 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
index c70e047..f69ff2d 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
@@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ static void stack_proc(void *arg)
struct task_struct *from = current, *to = arg;
to->thread.saved_task = from;
+ rcu_switch_from(from);
switch_to(from, to, from);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 9372174..aca4ef0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
/* Internal to kernel */
extern void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu);
extern void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu);
+extern void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
extern void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user);
struct notifier_block;
extern void rcu_idle_enter(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index e93df77..080b5bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
-static inline void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
-{
-}
-
static inline void exit_rcu(void)
{
}
@@ -102,7 +98,6 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
-void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
extern void exit_rcu(void);
int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(void);
@@ -116,7 +111,6 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
- rcu_preempt_note_context_switch();
}
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e692aba..a749c9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1879,12 +1879,22 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
}
+static inline void rcu_switch_from(struct task_struct *prev)
+{
+ if (prev->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 0)
+ rcu_preempt_note_context_switch();
+}
+
#else
static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
}
+static inline void rcu_switch_from(struct task_struct *prev)
+{
+}
+
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 1050d6d..6135150 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
trace_rcu_utilization("Start context switch");
rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
- rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu);
trace_rcu_utilization("End context switch");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index cdd1be0..d6b70b08 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -423,7 +423,6 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(char, rcu_cpu_has_work);
/* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.h */
static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
long rcu_batches_completed(void);
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu);
static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c023464..b1ac22e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
*
* Caller must disable preemption.
*/
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
(t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
- rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu);
+ rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
- rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id());
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -1018,14 +1018,6 @@ void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_force_quiescent_state);
/*
- * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
- * CPUs being in quiescent states.
- */
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-/*
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, there are never any preempted
* RCU readers.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5255c9d..10689da 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2051,6 +2051,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
#endif
/* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */
+ rcu_switch_from(prev);
switch_to(prev, next, prev);
barrier();
--
1.7.8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-14 16:19 [PATCH RFC 0/7] rcu: v2 Inlinable preemptible rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] rcu: Create per-CPU variables and avoid name conflict Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] rcu: Make exit_rcu() more precise and consolidate Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] rcu: Move __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock() to per-CPU variables Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] fs: Silence bogus copy_to_user() build errors Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] rcu: Inline preemptible RCU __rcu_read_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:20 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] rcu: Inline preemptible RCU __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:28 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] rcu: v2 Inlinable preemptible rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-15 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334420437-19264-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome