From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752179Ab2DRJZN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:25:13 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.10]:1162 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251Ab2DRJZL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:25:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1334741105.1924.5.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Subject: Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected From: Paul Bolle To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andi Kleen , Matthew Garrett , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Otte , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:25:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20120402235412.GD16303@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20120412142904.GA4130@srcf.ucam.org> <4F872C7B.6000106@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-2.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2012 09:25:05.0824 (UTC) FILETIME=[240AAA00:01CD1D45] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > For 3.4 I think reverting is the right approach. > > Ack. A revert of 6fe0d0628245fdcd6fad8b837c81e8f7ebc3364d ("ACPI: Make ACPI interrupt threaded") wasn't included in v3.4-rc3. Has it been pushed somewhere? Is testing needed before that revert can be pushed? Paul Bolle