From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756760Ab2DXRPZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:15:25 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:44345 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755828Ab2DXRPW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:15:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1335287700.28150.211.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Prashanth Nageshappa , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM mailing list , "Paul E. McKenney" , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Nikunj A Dadhania Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:15:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4F9555C5.6040601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120306204357.13169.90791.stgit@zurg> <1331067743.11248.333.camel@twins> <1331084302.11248.338.camel@twins> <4F5D00AE.8000602@openvz.org> <4F9555C5.6040601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 18:44 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > > Basically, our assumption that we are good to go (even with stale sched > domains) as long as the dying cpu was not in the cpu_active_mask, was wrong. Argh, that means cpu_active_mask is pointless.. so we should either fix that or remove that thing entirely. Anyway, tglx is reworking all that hotplug stuff as we speak, I think its best to wait for that dust to settle before we go make the mess even bigger.