From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757033Ab2DXRo4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:44:56 -0400 Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:26541 "EHLO ocex02.SolarFlarecom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756783Ab2DXRoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:44:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1335289485.17274.46.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM From: Ben Hutchings To: David Miller CC: , , , , , Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:44:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4F9031BF.10106@solarflare.com> <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net> Organization: Solarflare Communications Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-1.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.17.20.137] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-6.800.1017-18862.005 X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.861300-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote: > You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact > Subject line. > > Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what > is different in each of these changes. > > There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review > them? If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it? If not, why not? Sorry, I've been busy with another project. I'll reply to Stuart's patches faster next round. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.