From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757095Ab2DXTBm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:42 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:29196 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755884Ab2DXTBl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:41 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=V/z/IJbi c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=TWBfIqSxIMQA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=ich_fey3V0Z6hoRVRgYA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1335294097.28106.146.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE push and pull logic From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, cfriesen@nortel.com, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@ericsson.com, liming.wang@windriver.com Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1335293623.28150.216.camel@twins> References: <1333696481-3433-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1333696481-3433-7-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1334162018.23924.268.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1335273316.28150.194.camel@twins> <1335293456.28106.145.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1335293623.28150.216.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 20:53 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Well that's up to the implementation of pick_next_task_rt() that > conversion is just a minimal make it work thing. > > But the generic changes that patch carries should allow you to do what > you want, right? Yep. It should. -- Steve