From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758586Ab2D0Byx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:54:53 -0400
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:2493 "EHLO
	hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758125Ab2D0Byw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:54:52 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=V/z/IJbi c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=1X7j-zY8138A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9jDqrgaDWpdpeU7YpO0A:9 a=zdAeaz3Jp1XmrJzM2VkA:7 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29
Message-ID: <1335491689.28106.192.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] [GIT PULL] tracing: updates for 3.5
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:54:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1335491171.28106.190.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References: <20120426173404.666092637@goodmis.org>
	 <1335491171.28106.190.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 21:46 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I see you pulled in the patches individually instead of doing a git
> pull. But you missed the three patches that were in the previous pull
> request (that I only left out to not spam LKML as they were not
> changed). Also, without the git pull, it makes my repo out of sync with
> tip. As that is usually how I know what was pushed upstream or not.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 13:34 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > Although only two patches are in this, it really contains the 5 patches
> > that I pushed out earlier. As only patch 4/5 changed, instead of
> > spamming LKML with the same patches 1-3, I'm only reposting 4 and 5.
> > 
> > Patch 5 just came along for the ride (same as the previous post).
> > 
> > Patch 4 (here it's patch 1) was update as per Masami's suggestions (again).
> > 

Peter,

I just realized that these two patches contained a Cc to you, but the
cover letter did not Cc you. Probably confused you in what to pull.

Sorry about that.

-- Steve