From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:11:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337080288.27694.38.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120514212753.GM2366@google.com>
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:27 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.
> > >
> > > Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow.
> >
> > Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four
> > times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch.
> > Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.
>
> Peter, can I take your patch with Hugh's description w/ your SOB?
Yes, sorry, I meant to queue it up the lockdep tree but got distracted
by other stuff.
If you want it, feel tree to take it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-15 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-07 17:19 Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-08 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-08 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 18:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-08 22:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 22:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-09 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-09 20:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-10 17:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-14 21:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-15 15:10 ` [PATCH] lockdep: fix oops in processing workqueue Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 15:29 ` Dave Jones
2012-05-15 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 20:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-08 18:05 ` linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337080288.27694.38.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome