Re: [PATCH 3/5] st: get rid of scsi_tapes array

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>]

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 20:56 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the
> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the
> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape
> devices for character devices.
> 
> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from
> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>

This can't be Reviewed-by either.  The signoff chain has to follow the
transmission path of the patch.  If you send me Jeff's patches, you have
to add a signoff because you're a direct part of the transmission path.
If Jeff sends me them, then he can give you Reviewed-by because you're
not then in the direct transmission path.  (Signoff is supposed to imply
reviewed by anyway, so the tagging is correct in either case).

James