On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 12:45 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 17:27:37 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 17:03 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > > Comment above the function should have been changed too.
> > > (look for the "next_sqnum - get next sequence number" comment)
> > 
> > I do not think we should make these non-static. We should re-use the
> > entire scan_peb() function instead to scan the fastmap internal volume.
> 
> Sorry, couldn't follow you.
> 
> The new (outside eba.c) calls to 'ubi_next_sqnum' are from
> 'ubi_write_fastmap' (called from the 'ubi_update_fastmap' interface,
> implemented in fastmap.c) - during construction of VID headers of the
> FM_SB and FM_FATA.
> 
> IMO this is reasonable.
> 
> Do you suggest to somehow use existing ubi_eba_write_xxx functions?
> Or place the FM_SB/FM_DATA peb writing funtions into eba.c?

I think I meant the compare_lebs() exporting, not this one, replied to
wrong e-mail, sorry. Happens when I am in hurry - try to keep everyone
happy and make sure Richard is always busy with something :-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy