mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>,
	Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
Subject: [PATCH EDAC v26 05/66] edac: rewrite edac_align_ptr()
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:31:52 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337358773-6919-6-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337358773-6919-1-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com>

The edac_align_ptr() function is used to prepare data for a single
memory allocation kzalloc() call. It counts how many bytes are needed
by some data structure.

Using it as-is is not that trivial, as the quantity of memory elements
reserved is not there, but, instead, it is on a next call.

In order to avoid mistakes when using it, move the number of allocated
elements into it, making easier to use it.

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/edac/edac_device.c |   27 +++++++++++----------------
 drivers/edac/edac_mc.c     |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/edac/edac_module.h |    2 +-
 drivers/edac/edac_pci.c    |    6 +++---
 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
index 4b15459..cb397d9 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(
 	unsigned total_size;
 	unsigned count;
 	unsigned instance, block, attr;
-	void *pvt;
+	void *pvt, *p;
 	int err;
 
 	debugf4("%s() instances=%d blocks=%d\n",
@@ -92,35 +92,30 @@ struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(
 	 * to be at least as stringent as what the compiler would
 	 * provide if we could simply hardcode everything into a single struct.
 	 */
-	dev_ctl = (struct edac_device_ctl_info *)NULL;
+	p = NULL;
+	dev_ctl = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*dev_ctl), 1);
 
 	/* Calc the 'end' offset past end of ONE ctl_info structure
 	 * which will become the start of the 'instance' array
 	 */
-	dev_inst = edac_align_ptr(&dev_ctl[1], sizeof(*dev_inst));
+	dev_inst = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*dev_inst), nr_instances);
 
 	/* Calc the 'end' offset past the instance array within the ctl_info
 	 * which will become the start of the block array
 	 */
-	dev_blk = edac_align_ptr(&dev_inst[nr_instances], sizeof(*dev_blk));
+	count = nr_instances * nr_blocks;
+	dev_blk = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*dev_blk), count);
 
 	/* Calc the 'end' offset past the dev_blk array
 	 * which will become the start of the attrib array, if any.
 	 */
-	count = nr_instances * nr_blocks;
-	dev_attrib = edac_align_ptr(&dev_blk[count], sizeof(*dev_attrib));
-
-	/* Check for case of when an attribute array is specified */
-	if (nr_attrib > 0) {
-		/* calc how many nr_attrib we need */
+	/* calc how many nr_attrib we need */
+	if (nr_attrib > 0)
 		count *= nr_attrib;
+	dev_attrib = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*dev_attrib), count);
 
-		/* Calc the 'end' offset past the attributes array */
-		pvt = edac_align_ptr(&dev_attrib[count], sz_private);
-	} else {
-		/* no attribute array specificed */
-		pvt = edac_align_ptr(dev_attrib, sz_private);
-	}
+	/* Calc the 'end' offset past the attributes array */
+	pvt = edac_align_ptr(&p, sz_private, 1);
 
 	/* 'pvt' now points to where the private data area is.
 	 * At this point 'pvt' (like dev_inst,dev_blk and dev_attrib)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index 072aa81..ff8c002 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -101,18 +101,37 @@ const char *edac_mem_types[] = {
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mem_types);
 
-/* 'ptr' points to a possibly unaligned item X such that sizeof(X) is 'size'.
- * Adjust 'ptr' so that its alignment is at least as stringent as what the
- * compiler would provide for X and return the aligned result.
+/**
+ * edac_align_ptr - Prepares the pointer offsets for a single-shot allocation
+ * @p:		pointer to a pointer with the memory offset to be used. At
+ *		return, this will be incremented to point to the next offset
+ * @size:	Size of the data structure to be reserved
+ * @n_elems:	Number of elements that should be reserved
  *
  * If 'size' is a constant, the compiler will optimize this whole function
- * down to either a no-op or the addition of a constant to the value of 'ptr'.
+ * down to either a no-op or the addition of a constant to the value of '*p'.
+ *
+ * The 'p' pointer is absolutely needed to keep the proper advancing
+ * further in memory to the proper offsets when allocating the struct along
+ * with its embedded structs, as edac_device_alloc_ctl_info() does it
+ * above, for example.
+ *
+ * At return, the pointer 'p' will be incremented to be used on a next call
+ * to this function.
  */
-void *edac_align_ptr(void *ptr, unsigned size)
+void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
 {
 	unsigned align, r;
+	void *ptr = *p;
 
-	/* Here we assume that the alignment of a "long long" is the most
+	*p += size * n_elems;
+
+	/*
+	 * 'p' can possibly be an unaligned item X such that sizeof(X) is
+	 * 'size'.  Adjust 'p' so that its alignment is at least as
+	 * stringent as what the compiler would provide for X and return
+	 * the aligned result.
+	 * Here we assume that the alignment of a "long long" is the most
 	 * stringent alignment that the compiler will ever provide by default.
 	 * As far as I know, this is a reasonable assumption.
 	 */
@@ -132,6 +151,8 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void *ptr, unsigned size)
 	if (r == 0)
 		return (char *)ptr;
 
+	*p += align - r;
+
 	return (void *)(((unsigned long)ptr) + align - r);
 }
 
@@ -154,6 +175,7 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void *ptr, unsigned size)
 struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
 				unsigned nr_chans, int edac_index)
 {
+	void *ptr = NULL;
 	struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
 	struct csrow_info *csi, *csrow;
 	struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan;
@@ -168,11 +190,11 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
 	 * stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
 	 * hardcode everything into a single struct.
 	 */
-	mci = (struct mem_ctl_info *)0;
-	csi = edac_align_ptr(&mci[1], sizeof(*csi));
-	chi = edac_align_ptr(&csi[nr_csrows], sizeof(*chi));
-	dimm = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sizeof(*dimm));
-	pvt = edac_align_ptr(&dimm[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt);
+	mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
+	csi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*csi), nr_csrows);
+	chi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*chi), nr_csrows * nr_chans);
+	dimm = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*dimm), nr_csrows * nr_chans);
+	pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
 	size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
 
 	mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_module.h b/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
index 00f81b4..0ea7d14 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ extern void edac_device_reset_delay_period(struct edac_device_ctl_info
 					   *edac_dev, unsigned long value);
 extern void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value);
 
-extern void *edac_align_ptr(void *ptr, unsigned size);
+extern void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems);
 
 /*
  * EDAC PCI functions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
index 63af1c5..f1ac866 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
@@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ struct edac_pci_ctl_info *edac_pci_alloc_ctl_info(unsigned int sz_pvt,
 						const char *edac_pci_name)
 {
 	struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci;
-	void *pvt;
+	void *p = NULL, *pvt;
 	unsigned int size;
 
 	debugf1("%s()\n", __func__);
 
-	pci = (struct edac_pci_ctl_info *)0;
-	pvt = edac_align_ptr(&pci[1], sz_pvt);
+	pci = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*pci), 1);
+	pvt = edac_align_ptr(&p, 1, sz_pvt);
 	size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
 
 	/* Alloc the needed control struct memory */
-- 
1.7.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 16:31 [PATCH EDAC v26 00/66] EDAC patches for v3.5 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 01/66] edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 03/66] edac: Don't initialize csrow's first_page & friends when not needed Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 04/66] edac: move nr_pages to dimm struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 06/66] edac.h: Add generic layers for describing a memory location Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 08/66] amd64_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 09/66] amd76x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 10/66] cell_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 11/66] cpc925_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:31 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 12/66] e752x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 13/66] e7xxx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 14/66] i3000_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 15/66] i3200_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 16/66] i5000_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 17/66] i5100_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 18/66] i5400_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 19/66] i7300_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 20/66] i7core_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 21/66] i82443bxgx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 22/66] i82860_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 23/66] i82875p_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 24/66] i82975x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 25/66] mpc85xx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 26/66] mv64x60_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 27/66] pasemi_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 28/66] ppc4xx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 29/66] r82600_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 30/66] sb_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 31/66] tile_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 32/66] x38_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 33/66] edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 17:51   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 34/66] edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 35/66] edac: Cleanup the logs for i7core and sb edac drivers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 36/66] i5400_edac: improve debug messages to better represent the filled memory Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 37/66] RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-24 10:14   ` [PATCH] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-24 10:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-24 16:13       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-24 16:17         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-24 16:45         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-24 18:00           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-29 11:58             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-29 14:02               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-29 14:52                 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-29 15:23                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-30 23:24                     ` Luck, Tony
2012-05-31 10:00                       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 10:33                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 12:17                           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 13:56                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 14:22                               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 14:44                                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 14:54                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 15:01                                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 15:14                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 16:14                                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 17:13                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 18:04                                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-31 18:33                                               ` Aristeu Rozanski
2012-05-31 19:37                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 19:32                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:42                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 20:11                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:18                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 20:52                                                     ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-01  9:10                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-01  9:40                                                         ` Chen Gong
2012-06-01 12:15                                                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-06-01 15:42                                                         ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-01 16:00                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-01 18:21                                                             ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-01 23:00                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-01 23:19                                                                 ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-01 23:28                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 16:51                         ` Luck, Tony
2012-05-31 17:20                           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 18:14                             ` Luck, Tony
2012-05-31 19:26                               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31 18:24                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 38/66] i5000_edac: Fix the logic that retrieves memory information Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 39/66] e752x_edac: provide more info about how DIMMS/ranks are mapped Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 40/66] edac: Rename the parent dev to pdev Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 41/66] edac: use Documentation-nano format for some data structs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 42/66] edac: rewrite the sysfs code to use struct device Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 43/66] mpc85xx_edac: convert sysfs logic " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 44/66] amd64_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 45/66] i7core_edac: convert it " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 46/66] edac: Get rid of the old kobj's from the edac mc code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 47/66] edac: add a new per-dimm API and make the old per-virtual-rank API obsolete Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 48/66] edac: add a sysfs node to report the maximum location for the system Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 49/66] edac: Add debufs nodes to allow doing fake error inject Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 50/66] edac: Move grain/dtype/edac_type calculus to be out of channel loop Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 51/66] i82975x_edac: Test nr_pages earlier to save a few CPU cycles Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 52/66] i5100_edac: Fix a warning when compiled with 32 bits Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 53/66] i7300_edac: Get rid of some wrongly-solved rebase conflict Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 54/66] edac: Only expose csrows/channels on legacy API if they're populated Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 55/66] edac: change the mem allocation scheme to make Documentation/kobject.txt happy Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 56/66] i7core_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 57/66] edac: move documentation ABI to ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-edac Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 58/66] Edac: Add ABI Documentation for the new device nodes Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 59/66] i5000: Fix the fatal error handling Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 60/66] i7core: fix ranks information at the per-channel struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 61/66] edac: Don't add __func__ or __FILE__ for debugf[0-9] msgs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 62/66] edac: Use more normal debugging macro style Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 63/66] edac: Convert debugfX to edac_dbg(X, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 64/66] edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 65/66] edac: Increase version to 3.0.0 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:32 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 66/66] edac_mc: check for allocation failure in edac_mc_alloc() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 16:46 ` [PATCH EDAC v26 00/66] EDAC patches for v3.5 Borislav Petkov
2012-05-18 17:43   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-18 17:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-28 15:46       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-28 20:36         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-28 23:13           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-29  2:40             ` Chen Gong
2012-05-29 11:45               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1337358773-6919-6-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®