From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755187Ab2EWGcr (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 02:32:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:36820 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752313Ab2EWGcp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 02:32:45 -0400 From: Liu Ping Fan To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori Subject: [RFC] kvm: export host NUMA info to guest's scheduler Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:32:27 +0800 Message-Id: <1337754751-9018-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.4.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently, the guest can not know the NUMA info of the vcpu, which will result in performance drawback. For example: Supposing vcpu-a on nodeA, vcpu-b on nodeB, when load balance, the tasks' pull and push between these vcpus will cost more. But unfortunately, currently, the guest is just blind to this. So here is the idea to solve it. Export host numa info through guest's sched domain to its scheduler. So the guest's lb will consider the cost. These patches include: For guest: 0001-sched-add-virt-sched-domain-for-the-guest.patch 0002-sched-add-virt-domain-device-s-driver.patch For host: 0001-kvm-collect-vcpus-numa-info-for-guest-s-scheduler.patch 0001-Qemu-add-virt-sched-domain-device.patch Please give some comments and suggestion. Thanks and regards, pingfan