mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez" <siglesias@igalia.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: ipack: fix failure registering an ipack device
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:42:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337769731.3666.8.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120523104115.GL4637@mwanda>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1062 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > Trying to install an ipack device it always failed in the match() function. This
> > patch fixes all the bugs present there.
> > 
> 
> This looks like part of it is undoing stuff introduced in
> [patch 1/3]?  I was going to ask what the stuff was in 1/3 and then
> it got removed which makes me wonder why even more.  Could you write
> something about why in your changelog?  Or if it's not needed then
> remove it from the first patch.
> 
> Really it would be easier to review if you broke it up into one
> patch per bug, with a description of what the bugs were instead of
> "patch fixes all the bugs present there".
> 
> Some of these changes don't seem necessary.  It feels like you were
> debugging and then when you got match() to work you just committed
> all the changes instead of only the lines which are needed.
> 

Yes, you are right. I will work again on these patches.

Thanks,

Sam


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-23 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-23  9:13 [PATCH 1/3] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: delete sysfs files Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
2012-05-23  9:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] Staging: ipack: fix failure registering an ipack device Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
2012-05-23 10:41   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-05-23 10:42     ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez [this message]
2012-05-23  9:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: remove name field from slot_irq Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1337769731.3666.8.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com \
    --to=siglesias@igalia.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®