From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mcgrathr@google.com, hpa@zytor.com, indan@nul.nu,
netdev@parisplace.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, mingo@redhat.com,
oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
pmoore@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
markus@chromium.org, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
keescook@chromium.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jmorris@namei.org, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arch/x86: move secure_computing after ptrace
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:08:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337875681-20717-3-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337875681-20717-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org>
At present, seccomp modes 1 and 2 may have their
behavior changed by a ptrace()ing task. The ptracer
cannot change blocked/disallowed system calls, but it can
change allowed system calls to calls that would otherwise
not be allowed by the seccomp policy.
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 13b1990..ad649a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1479,13 +1479,6 @@ long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- /* do the secure computing check first */
- if (secure_computing(regs->orig_ax)) {
- /* seccomp failures shouldn't expose any additional code. */
- ret = -1L;
- goto out;
- }
-
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)))
ret = -1L;
@@ -1493,6 +1486,12 @@ long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
ret = -1L;
+ /* check secure computing after userspace can't change the syscall. */
+ if (!ret && secure_computing(regs->orig_ax)) {
+ ret = -1L;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->orig_ax);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 18:21 seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order? Eric Paris
2012-05-21 18:25 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-21 19:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-22 16:23 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 16:26 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 17:39 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 20:26 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 20:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-22 20:48 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 21:07 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 21:17 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-22 21:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-22 22:20 ` Al Viro
2012-05-22 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-22 21:14 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-22 21:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] move the secure_computing call Will Drewry
2012-05-24 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] seccomp: Don't allow tracers to abuse RET_TRACE Will Drewry
2012-05-24 17:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 18:24 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-24 20:17 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 16:08 ` Will Drewry [this message]
2012-05-24 16:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arch/*: move secure_computing after trace Will Drewry
2012-05-24 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] move the secure_computing call H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 18:07 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-24 18:27 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 19:39 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-05-24 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-25 1:55 ` Will Drewry
2012-05-24 23:40 ` James Morris
2012-05-24 23:43 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-24 23:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 0:26 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-25 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-25 0:55 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-05-21 18:47 ` seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order? richard -rw- weinberger
2012-05-21 19:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337875681-20717-3-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org \
--to=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=markus@chromium.org \
--cc=mcgrathr@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@parisplace.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®