From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933179Ab2EaT0h (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:26:37 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:16223 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933015Ab2EaT0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:26:35 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ae7jbGUt c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=VX6CzOvcUL8A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=MnQ-rof0g0aW2w0_iycA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1338492393.13348.385.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter From: Steven Rostedt To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Masami Hiramatsu , Dave Jones , Andi Kleen Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:26:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com> References: <20120531012829.160060586@goodmis.org> <20120531020441.165841749@goodmis.org> <4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 12:19 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/30/2012 06:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index > > 9087527..c1fffc5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c +++ > > b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c @@ -450,8 +450,10 @@ static inline void > > nmi_nesting_preprocess(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > > static inline void nmi_nesting_postprocess(void) { - if > > (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) + if > > (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) { > > debug_stack_reset(); + __get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack) = 0; + } > > } #endif > > > > Please don't use __get_cpu_var(); it causes a pointer to be manifest, > which is free or almost free on most architectures but quite expensive > on x86. > > Instead use this_cpu_read()/this_cpu_write(). OK, will change. Thanks! -- Steve