From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:37:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338500240.13348.453.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC7DDF1.5070606@zytor.com>
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 14:09 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> No, I'm asking what environments (alternate stacks) are permitted where.
> That is the important information.
I believe that the IST stack switch is just a convenient way to allow
separate stacks for separate events instead of trying to handle all
events on a single stack, and risk stack overflow.
Thus, the debug/int3 and NMI events use a separate stack to not stress
the current stack that is not expected to switch. The external interrupt
stacks are switched on entry of the interrupt and stays on that stack
and until its finished. There's a check to see if it is already on the
stack before it does the switch so that it doesn't have the HW switch
issues that NMI and int3 has.
Thus, if we say we must stay on either the NMI stack or the DEBUG stack,
then this is what happens. Well, almost.
For NMIs, if it preempted something on the debug stack, it will always
stay on the NMI stack and never switch. A check is made for both debug
stacks at once:
int is_debug_stack(unsigned long addr)
{
return __get_cpu_var(debug_stack_usage) ||
(addr <= __get_cpu_var(debug_stack_addr) &&
addr > (__get_cpu_var(debug_stack_addr) - DEBUG_STKSZ));
}
Where:
#define DEBUG_STACK_ORDER (EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER + 1)
#define DEBUG_STKSZ (PAGE_SIZE << DEBUG_STACK_ORDER)
But if the NMI did not preempt the DEBUG stack, and it hits a breakpoint
it will switch to the debug stack. And it is possible to make another
switch if the debug code were to somehow.
Thus the transactions are something like this:
NORMAL_STACK (either kernel/user/irq) -> DEBUG1 -> DEBUG2
NORMAL_STACK -> DEBUG1 -> NMI
NORMAL_STACK -> DEBUG1 -> DEBUG2 -> NMI
NORMAL_STACK -> NMI -> DEBUG1 -> DEBUG2
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 1:28 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: Synchronize variable setting with breakpoints Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 15:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-05-31 15:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 19:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-05-31 20:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 4:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 11:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 12:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 0:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: Use breakpoint method to update ftrace caller Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 19:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 19:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 21:37 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-05-31 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 2:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace/x86: Do not change stacks in DEBUG when calling lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 2:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] (for 3.5)[GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338500240.13348.453.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®