From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Fix deadlock in ppr-handling error path
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:05:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338559501-15478-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338559501-15478-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
In the error path of the ppr_notifer it can happen that the
iommu->lock is taken recursivly. This patch fixes the
problem by releasing the iommu->lock before any notifier is
invoked. This also requires to move the erratum workaround
for the ppr-log (interrupt may be faster than data in the log)
one function up.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.3, v3.4
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index d90a421..a2e418c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -547,26 +547,12 @@ static void iommu_poll_events(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
}
-static void iommu_handle_ppr_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u32 head)
+static void iommu_handle_ppr_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u64 *raw)
{
struct amd_iommu_fault fault;
- volatile u64 *raw;
- int i;
INC_STATS_COUNTER(pri_requests);
- raw = (u64 *)(iommu->ppr_log + head);
-
- /*
- * Hardware bug: Interrupt may arrive before the entry is written to
- * memory. If this happens we need to wait for the entry to arrive.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < LOOP_TIMEOUT; ++i) {
- if (PPR_REQ_TYPE(raw[0]) != 0)
- break;
- udelay(1);
- }
-
if (PPR_REQ_TYPE(raw[0]) != PPR_REQ_FAULT) {
pr_err_ratelimited("AMD-Vi: Unknown PPR request received\n");
return;
@@ -578,12 +564,6 @@ static void iommu_handle_ppr_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u32 head)
fault.tag = PPR_TAG(raw[0]);
fault.flags = PPR_FLAGS(raw[0]);
- /*
- * To detect the hardware bug we need to clear the entry
- * to back to zero.
- */
- raw[0] = raw[1] = 0;
-
atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ppr_notifier, 0, &fault);
}
@@ -595,25 +575,62 @@ static void iommu_poll_ppr_log(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
if (iommu->ppr_log == NULL)
return;
+ /* enable ppr interrupts again */
+ writel(MMIO_STATUS_PPR_INT_MASK, iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_STATUS_OFFSET);
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, flags);
head = readl(iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_PPR_HEAD_OFFSET);
tail = readl(iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_PPR_TAIL_OFFSET);
while (head != tail) {
+ volatile u64 *raw;
+ u64 entry[2];
+ int i;
- /* Handle PPR entry */
- iommu_handle_ppr_entry(iommu, head);
+ raw = (u64 *)(iommu->ppr_log + head);
+
+ /*
+ * Hardware bug: Interrupt may arrive before the entry is
+ * written to memory. If this happens we need to wait for the
+ * entry to arrive.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < LOOP_TIMEOUT; ++i) {
+ if (PPR_REQ_TYPE(raw[0]) != 0)
+ break;
+ udelay(1);
+ }
+
+ /* Avoid memcpy function-call overhead */
+ entry[0] = raw[0];
+ entry[1] = raw[1];
- /* Update and refresh ring-buffer state*/
+ /*
+ * To detect the hardware bug we need to clear the entry
+ * back to zero.
+ */
+ raw[0] = raw[1] = 0UL;
+
+ /* Update head pointer of hardware ring-buffer */
head = (head + PPR_ENTRY_SIZE) % PPR_LOG_SIZE;
writel(head, iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_PPR_HEAD_OFFSET);
+
+ /*
+ * Release iommu->lock because ppr-handling might need to
+ * re-aquire it
+ */
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
+
+ /* Handle PPR entry */
+ iommu_handle_ppr_entry(iommu, entry);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, flags);
+
+ /* Refresh ring-buffer information */
+ head = readl(iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_PPR_HEAD_OFFSET);
tail = readl(iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_PPR_TAIL_OFFSET);
}
- /* enable ppr interrupts again */
- writel(MMIO_STATUS_PPR_INT_MASK, iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_STATUS_OFFSET);
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
}
--
1.7.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 14:05 [PATCH 1/2] iommu/amd: Cache pdev pointer to root-bridge Joerg Roedel
2012-06-01 14:05 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338559501-15478-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®