mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Charles Wang <muming.wq@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Tao Ma" <tm@tao.ma>, 含黛 <handai.szj@taobao.com>,
	"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:39:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339781988.15222.6.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDB4642.5070509@gmail.com>

Wednesday I ended up with something like the below.. but I haven't
gotten round to trying Doug's latest testing method, nor did I really
read the email I'm now replying to.

I think it does something like what Wang described... every time I try
and write comments related to why it does this I get stuck though. 

I ran out of time again for this week, I'll try and prod at it a little
more next week (and try and catch up with the thread).

In the meantime I thought I might as well post this.. who knows somebody
might be bored over the weekend, it might actually work, or not :-)

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index ca07ee0..4101a0e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2198,26 +2198,49 @@ calc_load(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, unsigned long active)
  *
  * When making the ILB scale, we should try to pull this in as well.
  */
-static atomic_long_t calc_load_tasks_idle;
+static atomic_long_t calc_load_idle[2];
+static int calc_load_idx;
+
+static inline int calc_load_write_idx(void)
+{
+	int idx = calc_load_idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * See calc_global_nohz(), if we observe the new index, we also
+	 * need to observe the new update time.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update))
+		idx++;
+
+	return idx & 1;
+}
+
+static inline int calc_load_read_idx(void)
+{
+	return calc_load_idx & 1;
+}
 
 void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
 	long delta;
+	int idx;
 
 	delta = calc_load_fold_active(this_rq);
-	if (delta)
-		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks_idle);
+	if (delta) {
+		idx = calc_load_write_idx();
+		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_idle[idx]);
+	}
 }
 
 static long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
 {
+	int idx = calc_load_read_idx();
 	long delta = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * Its got a race, we don't care...
-	 */
-	if (atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks_idle))
-		delta = atomic_long_xchg(&calc_load_tasks_idle, 0);
+	if (atomic_long_read(&calc_load_idle[idx]))
+		delta = atomic_long_xchg(&calc_load_idle[idx], 0);
 
 	return delta;
 }
@@ -2313,26 +2336,32 @@ static void calc_global_nohz(void)
 	if (delta)
 		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks);
 
-	/*
-	 * It could be the one fold was all it took, we done!
-	 */
-	if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10))
-		return;
+	if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) {
+		/*
+		 * Catch-up, fold however many we are behind still
+		 */
+		delta = jiffies - calc_load_update - 10;
+		n = 1 + (delta / LOAD_FREQ);
 
-	/*
-	 * Catch-up, fold however many we are behind still
-	 */
-	delta = jiffies - calc_load_update - 10;
-	n = 1 + (delta / LOAD_FREQ);
+		active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks);
+		active = active > 0 ? active * FIXED_1 : 0;
 
-	active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks);
-	active = active > 0 ? active * FIXED_1 : 0;
+		avenrun[0] = calc_load_n(avenrun[0], EXP_1, active, n);
+		avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n);
+		avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n);
 
-	avenrun[0] = calc_load_n(avenrun[0], EXP_1, active, n);
-	avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n);
-	avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n);
+		calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ;
+	}
 
-	calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ;
+	/*
+	 * Flip the idle index...
+	 *
+	 * Make sure we first write the new time then flip the index, so that
+	 * calc_load_write_idx() will see the new time when it reads the new
+	 * index, this avoids a double flip messing things up.
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	calc_load_idx++;
 }
 #else
 void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09 10:54 Charles Wang
2012-06-11 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <4FD6BFC4.1060302@gmail.com>
2012-06-12  8:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12  9:34   ` Charles Wang
2012-06-12  9:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13  5:55       ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  7:56         ` Charles Wang
2012-06-14  4:41           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-14 15:42             ` Charles Wang
2012-06-16  6:42               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  8:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:33           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 21:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14  3:13               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 10:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-20 19:24         ` sched: care and feeding of load-avg code (Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate) Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-15 14:27       ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-15 17:39         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-16 14:53           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18  6:41             ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 14:41               ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 10:06           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 16:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:08           ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-19  9:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 15:50               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-20  9:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-21  4:12                   ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-21  6:35                     ` Charles Wang
2012-06-21  8:48                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-22 14:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-24 21:45                       ` Doug Smythies
2012-07-03 16:01                         ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-25  2:15                       ` Charles Wang
2012-07-06  6:19                       ` [tip:sched/core] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:19           ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Doug Smythies
2012-06-19  6:24           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-19  9:57             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339781988.15222.6.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muming.wq@gmail.com \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome