From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wfg@linux.intel.com, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] printk: use mutex lock to stop syslog_seq from going wild
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:21:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339852911-29481-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Although syslog_seq and log_next_seq stuff are protected by logbuf_lock
spin log, it's not enough. Say we have two processes A and B, and let
syslog_seq = N, while log_next_seq = N + 1, and the two processes both
come to syslog_print at almost the same time. And No matter which
process get the spin lock first, it will increase syslog_seq by one,
then release spin lock; thus later, another process increase syslog_seq
by one again. In this case, syslog_seq is bigger than syslog_next_seq.
And latter, it would make:
wait_event_interruptiable(log_wait, syslog != log_next_seq)
don't wait any more even there is no new write comes. Thus it introduce
a infinite loop reading.
I can easily see this kind of issue by the following steps:
# cat /proc/kmsg # at meantime, I don't kill rsyslog
# So they are the two processes.
# xinit # I added drm.debug=6 in the kernel parameter line,
# so that it will produce lots of message and let that
# issue happen
It's 100% reproducable on my side. And my disk will be filled up by
/var/log/messages in a quite short time.
So, introduce a mutex_lock to stop syslog_seq from going wild just like
what devkmsg_read() does. It does fix this issue as expected.
v2: use mutex_lock_interruptiable() instead (comments from Kay)
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
kernel/printk.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 32462d2..ce7c5b7 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -414,7 +414,9 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
if (!user)
return -EBADF;
- mutex_lock(&user->lock);
+ ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&user->lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
while (user->seq == log_next_seq) {
if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
@@ -974,6 +976,7 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file)
{
bool clear = false;
static int saved_console_loglevel = -1;
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(syslog_mutex);
int error;
error = check_syslog_permissions(type, from_file);
@@ -1000,11 +1003,17 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file)
error = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
+ error = mutex_lock_interruptible(&syslog_mutex);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
error = wait_event_interruptible(log_wait,
syslog_seq != log_next_seq);
- if (error)
+ if (error) {
+ mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
goto out;
+ }
error = syslog_print(buf, len);
+ mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
break;
/* Read/clear last kernel messages */
case SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR:
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-16 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-16 13:21 Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2012-06-16 14:38 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339852911-29481-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®