From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A6DC433F5 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 01:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229445AbiCFByU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2022 20:54:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44236 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230470AbiCFByS (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2022 20:54:18 -0500 Received: from relay5.hostedemail.com (relay5.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.40]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A207307B for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 17:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from omf03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A6421106; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 01:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C1EB6000B; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 01:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <133c543af026f99f0cd148d4403cf426e8470666.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: Replace bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' From: Joe Perches To: Henry Sloan Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:53:24 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20220305205528.463894-7-henryksloan@gmail.com> <20220306012804.117574-1-henryksloan@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4-1ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6C1EB6000B X-Stat-Signature: bn911fnywchixjbq847s3kdwapwqtsam X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/ohUxZXFbRhkSXApJJz7HE0ccBX4HvrHE= X-HE-Tag: 1646531603-34971 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2022-03-05 at 20:44 -0500, Henry Sloan wrote: > I agree the bool conversion should be a separate patch. Would it be proper > to resubmit the whole patchset with a new, seventh patch containing the > bool conversion? If I was to do so, should all of those patches be labelled > v2, but without any changelogs since none of the present patches will have > been changed? Generally yes, but it depends on the upstream maintainer's preference. Ideally: o a 0/n patch cover letter could be used to describe the change/addition o each proposed patch has a patch description above your Signed-off-by: