From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754104Ab2FSMaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:30:19 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:21515 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751972Ab2FSMaR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:30:17 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=eIiRfQV1 c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=FNqztoQSzWUA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=vqF6KEcjAAAA:8 a=jUg4Kj2VfCkoZYuS6VUA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=FeP6IhHVxj4A:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1340109015.25903.217.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tools lib traceevent: Replace malloc_or_die to plain calloc in alloc_event() From: Steven Rostedt To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Namhyung Kim Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r4tbhgqf.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> References: <1339987851-22491-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1340027148.25903.90.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120618140625.GH2303@infradead.org> <87r4tbhgqf.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 17:02 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi, Arnaldo > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:06:25 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:45:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu: > >> Arnaldo, > >> > >> I've acked this series. Can you add my Acked-by tags on the patches that > >> do not have it yet, and then pull it into your repo? > > > > Sure thing, I'll put it in my perf/core branch, > > > > As I said before [1], those patches are based on my libtraceevent/next > branch which contains a couple of commits not merged into tip or your > tree. They are my previous backport work, and Steve wanted to leave them > out for 3.6 cycle [2]. As the merge window has closed, I was under the assumption that these patches are for 3.6. That's what I wanted them queued up for. -- Steve