From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Factor out enable and disable operations some more
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:12:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340806326-30525-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
Create new _regulator_do_enable() and _regulator_do_disable() operations
which deal with the mechanics of performing the enable and disable, partly
to cut down on the levels of indentation and partly to support some future
work.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index d19480b..60329fe 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1435,10 +1435,50 @@ void devm_regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_regulator_put);
+static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ int ret, delay;
+
+ /* Query before enabling in case configuration dependent. */
+ ret = _regulator_get_enable_time(rdev);
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ delay = ret;
+ } else {
+ rdev_warn(rdev, "enable_time() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ delay = 0;
+ }
+
+ trace_regulator_enable(rdev_get_name(rdev));
+
+ if (rdev->desc->ops->enable) {
+ ret = rdev->desc->ops->enable(rdev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Allow the regulator to ramp; it would be useful to extend
+ * this for bulk operations so that the regulators can ramp
+ * together. */
+ trace_regulator_enable_delay(rdev_get_name(rdev));
+
+ if (delay >= 1000) {
+ mdelay(delay / 1000);
+ udelay(delay % 1000);
+ } else if (delay) {
+ udelay(delay);
+ }
+
+ trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* locks held by regulator_enable() */
static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
- int ret, delay;
+ int ret;
/* check voltage and requested load before enabling */
if (rdev->constraints &&
@@ -1452,40 +1492,10 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (!_regulator_can_change_status(rdev))
return -EPERM;
- if (!rdev->desc->ops->enable)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* Query before enabling in case configuration
- * dependent. */
- ret = _regulator_get_enable_time(rdev);
- if (ret >= 0) {
- delay = ret;
- } else {
- rdev_warn(rdev, "enable_time() failed: %d\n",
- ret);
- delay = 0;
- }
-
- trace_regulator_enable(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-
- /* Allow the regulator to ramp; it would be useful
- * to extend this for bulk operations so that the
- * regulators can ramp together. */
- ret = rdev->desc->ops->enable(rdev);
+ ret = _regulator_do_enable(rdev);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- trace_regulator_enable_delay(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-
- if (delay >= 1000) {
- mdelay(delay / 1000);
- udelay(delay % 1000);
- } else if (delay) {
- udelay(delay);
- }
-
- trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-
} else if (ret < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev, "is_enabled() failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -1534,6 +1544,30 @@ int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_enable);
+static int _regulator_do_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ trace_regulator_disable(rdev_get_name(rdev));
+
+ if (rdev->ena_gpio) {
+ gpio_set_value_cansleep(rdev->ena_gpio,
+ rdev->ena_gpio_invert);
+ rdev->ena_gpio_state = 0;
+
+ } else if (rdev->desc->ops->disable) {
+ ret = rdev->desc->ops->disable(rdev);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ trace_regulator_disable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
+
+ _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
+ NULL);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* locks held by regulator_disable() */
static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
@@ -1548,20 +1582,12 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
(rdev->constraints && !rdev->constraints->always_on)) {
/* we are last user */
- if (_regulator_can_change_status(rdev) &&
- rdev->desc->ops->disable) {
- trace_regulator_disable(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-
- ret = rdev->desc->ops->disable(rdev);
+ if (_regulator_can_change_status(rdev)) {
+ ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable\n");
return ret;
}
-
- trace_regulator_disable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-
- _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
- NULL);
}
rdev->use_count = 0;
--
1.7.10
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-27 14:12 Mark Brown [this message]
2012-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: core: Add core support for GPIO controlled enable lines Mark Brown
2012-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: fixed: Use core GPIO enable support Mark Brown
2012-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: wm8994: " Mark Brown
2012-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Implement " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340806326-30525-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®