From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932087Ab2GBQve (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:51:34 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:46243 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985Ab2GBQvc (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:51:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="187575323" Message-ID: <1341248135.2979.33.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: ext4 blocks up From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Ext4 Mailing List , Linux FS Maling List , Linux Kernel Maling List Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:55:35 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20120702164548.GD18074@thunk.org> References: <1341231316.2979.11.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120702144444.GA18074@thunk.org> <1341240862.2979.23.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120702151442.GB18074@thunk.org> <20120702164548.GD18074@thunk.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yEEP3voHyr13RjAIxMdf" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-yEEP3voHyr13RjAIxMdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:45 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:14:42AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:54:22PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > Can you tell me *which* xfstest this was blocking on? > > >=20 > > > Test 068 which runs fsstress. > >=20 > > Hmmm, I had just started an xfstests -g auto run using standard ext4 > > defaults with 3.5-rc2, and I'm not noting any problems. And I've > > gotten past test 68 w/o any problems. >=20 > I just tried again with 3.5-rc5, and I was able to reproduce your > failure by using "check 68 68 68 68 68" (it failed after the 2nd time > it ran the fsstress test. What's interesting is that there have been > no changes in fs/ext4 or fs/jbd2 since 3.5-rc2. So this may have been > caused by a writeback related change; I'm starting a bisect now. OK, cool, let me know if you need help, I'll be able to help tomorrow. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-yEEP3voHyr13RjAIxMdf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP8dKHAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0oEgP/2vEjwpJhUPHwC0GWr59kxjB LTBhbbj0oraDZxVdZXoJW4EqI7vAjh6NREkp3p9o4jmosvolytyg0zYAP240er7+ pq7ZcBTx4fTVhmx6hETvMpcNKlAK3CqRrSL4mLxYZJc19PJC1TC3mdUDvIlhlYzP miqEJ2WXiCWy0We+h+oUG1uJ08uFx6+ZpP2RwOUlWPY4FsOikgwtVi7CZIMdX9Rh STXCU4BL3Aqq+u6VkR0IZPveBdpwGRu9wvgSn3ZJp19DxH2zU8XSItyX3QIwNTV3 pyKiaaSC3VbYtof4eImZyGD//ZCaJNku1b7jhrEYC+YgfYjZXfU+RqtIZzf6Wltw JJLFx557JDJmJ5uQQfdfV4ukoAsX5mXfPFJ/BXovn0g42WyoxdGCM7W30Cz48ji5 wEt/rcJ+soBB0TjMEr6lifm1PNIl8fgHkmYmuaUP6yc5Qwzfm7DTuu7ArpsGdMEr 7d8eZ/opbCHGRUokNWEdNNuRKCPoQvh9lJ3A7pVSSBaIs7OdEKBBu/J4v6U9XVr9 O8Vc5kz2u8dWLHEca55AOWv+wrIP5dsv7Z+/pXN98Pkw6wazFMdAOaPsUHsAZwiy ZeqgmJ9sxj64Ix9seX+VhMLdtI2dxF5r8sQoBzZYh+BhRyQ0RmLwDdQKllINtq8i VCBv6rLmk+w2JI3iSFB6 =QmS5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yEEP3voHyr13RjAIxMdf--