From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756823Ab2GFOIo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:08:44 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52447 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754234Ab2GFOIm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:08:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental From: Jean Delvare To: LKML Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Ven , Andi Kleen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Suse Linux Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:08:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1341583705.4655.18.camel@amber.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This feature has been around for over 5 years now, so I presume it is no longer considered experimental. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andi Kleen --- Or is there any reason to still consider this an experimental feature? arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-3.5-rc5.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig 2012-06-05 16:22:58.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-3.5-rc5/arch/x86/Kconfig 2012-07-06 15:32:55.660276577 +0200 @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ config SECCOMP If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here. config CC_STACKPROTECTOR - bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)" + bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection" ---help--- This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on -- Jean Delvare Suse L3