From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755453Ab2GFUTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:19:15 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.5]:1674 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751112Ab2GFUTO (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:19:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1341605949.22584.6.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental From: Paul Bolle To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Jean Delvare , Randy Dunlap , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:19:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FF72733.8000007@linux.intel.com> References: <1341583705.4655.18.camel@amber.site> <4FF71F1C.4040608@xenotime.net> <1341597439.4655.23.camel@amber.site> <4FF72733.8000007@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2012 20:19:10.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A714D90:01CD5BB4] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:58 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I rather just retire the whole concept of "Experimental". > > it's really utterly meaningless in practice anyway. See Russell King's quick survey in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/18/397 : almost all defconfigs had CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enabled. I didn't recheck since I'm sure little has changed. That macro and the related Kconfig symbol seem indeed meaningless. Paul Bolle