From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753359Ab2GILuW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:50:22 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33239 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753132Ab2GILuV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:50:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental From: Jean Delvare To: Paul Bolle Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Randy Dunlap , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <1341820572.4605.35.camel@amber.site> References: <1341583705.4655.18.camel@amber.site> <4FF71F1C.4040608@xenotime.net> <1341597439.4655.23.camel@amber.site> <4FF72733.8000007@linux.intel.com> <1341605949.22584.6.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <1341820572.4605.35.camel@amber.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Suse Linux Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:50:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1341834605.4605.53.camel@amber.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le lundi 09 juillet 2012 à 09:56 +0200, Jean Delvare a écrit : > As for options still depending on EXPERIMENTAL when they no longer > should, this can partly be explained when the EXPERIMENTAL dependency > doesn't show up in the short description. This is the case of > CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR. As everybody has CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enabled, > nobody notices the dependency. Sorry, I got it the wrong way around (not that it necessarily matters for the general picture): CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR no longer depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL, but it does still have "(EXPERIMENTAL)" in its short description. So there is no excuse for us not noticing, assuming the feature is really no longer experimental. -- Jean Delvare Suse L3